MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412642686 · doi:10.15690/vsp.v24i3.2906

Botulinotherapy and Orthopedic Interventions After Selective Dorsal Rhizotomy in Children with Cerebral Palsy: Cohort Study

2025· article· en· W4412642686 on OpenAlex
O. A. Klochkova, Ekaterina I. Smolyankina, Dmitriy Yu. Zinenko, A. M. Mamedyarov, Ulviya Sh. Ashrafova

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueВопросы современной педиатрии · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
Canadian institutionsChildren’s Health Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRhizotomyCerebral palsyOrthopedic surgeryMedicineDorsumPsychological interventionCohortPhysical medicine and rehabilitationPhysical therapyAnatomySurgeryInternal medicinePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background . Selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) is an effective neurosurgical method for reducing spasticity in children with cerebral palsy (CP). The need for other medical (anti-spastic) and surgical treatment methods after SDR remains poorly studied. Objective . Aim of the study is to evaluate the frequency of using botulinum therapy and orthopedic interventions, as well as target muscles selection for injection in patients with cerebral palsy after SDR. Methods . Prospective cohort study included patients under the age of 18 years after SDR performed between January 2021 and June 2023. Frequency, timing, target muscles for botulinotherapy, oral anti-spastic drugs administration, as well as frequency, timing, and type of orthopedic surgeries (year after rehabilitation due to performed SDR) were determined via interviewing (remote or face-to-face) of patients’ legal representatives. Results . The study included data from 107 children with spastic cerebral palsy (GMFCS I — 2, GMFCS II — 14, GMFCS III — 68, GMFCS IV — 22, GMFCS V — 1) who underwent SDR at median age of 5.0 (3.9; 6.9) years. The follow-up period after SDR was 12–41 months, median was 20.8 (16.5; 26.7) months. Botulinotherapy was performed in 24 (22.4%) patients (4 for the first time) after SDR, the initiation period was 1.5–36 months after SDR, the median was 10.7 (6.9; 16.4) months. Injections were performed only in the arm’s muscles in 4 children, only in leg’s muscles — in 10, in upper and lower limbs — in 10, in salivary glands — in 1 case. Orthopedic surgeries were performed in 26 (24.3%) cases 3.5–34 months after SDR, median — 14.8 (8.0; 22.6) months. Procedures on soft-tissues of lower limbs were performed in 17 patients, 9 patients had combined soft tissue and bone surgery. Age at surgery was 3.3–12.7 years, median age — 5.9 (5.0; 8.5) years. Oral myorelaxant administration after SDR (continued) was reported only in one patient. Conclusion . Some patients with cerebral palsy require implementation of other methods for spasticity and orthopedic deformities correction even after SDR due to the child growth.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Direct model labels (unvalidated)

Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.

Model armCategoriesStudy designConfidence
gemmano category
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Observationallow
gptno category
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Observationalmedium
models agreeAgreement compares identical category sets and study designs across arms.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it