Bibliographic record
Abstract
During his university studies his father and brother died and he was forced to interrupt his studies for one year.Two professors of the Technical University, Lajos Romsauer and József Kürschák helped him with a scholarship and he was awarded his university degree in 1930.Already in the secondary school he had organized a students circle in mathematics and from 1925 he published several papers in Középiskolai Matematikai és Fizikai Lapok, the Secondary School Mathematics and Physics Journal.Later he was also involved in editing the journal until 1939.He worked for a short period as an assistant professor at the Technical University and then taught at the Scientific Lyceum in Győr from 1931 until 1940.His ars poetica as a teacher was to teach students to understand the process of how theorems were discovered, not just presenting the final formulations.Several distinguished mathematicians, the algebraist Tibor Szele for example, said that he was influenced by the "problem poetry" of Kárteszi.His problems were always "real problems" not just difficult exercises.Kárteszi defended his PhD thesis "On the ten conics determined by six points lying on a conic and the corresponding configurations" in 1933 at Pázmány Péter University, Budapest.After publishing two papers in the Bollettino dell'Unione Matematica Italiana in 1935 he won a scholarship to visit the University of Bologna (Italy) in 1936-37.In this period he worked with Beppo Levi and Beniamino Segre.World War II was a particularly difficult period for Kárteszi.He was involved in active service as a soldier several times during the war and then he was prisoner of war but even in this difficult period he was active mathematically.In the rare periods when he was not in the army, he studied the unpublished mathematical work of the two Bolyais in Transsylvania, and edited a didactic journal Matematikai és Természettudományi Didaktikai Lapok with Pál Veress, György Alexits, and György Hajós.He became Professor at Eötvös Loránd University (1950), and was head of the Department of Descriptive and Projective Geometry (from 1951 to
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".