MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412659546 · doi:10.7759/cureus.88817

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of P2Y12 Inhibitor Monotherapy Versus Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI): A Systematic Review

2025· review· en· W4412659546 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mohsin Khan, Nouman Anthony, Mihir Nikalje, M Shah, Taj Rajan Jacob Metharayil, Fathima Ruqaiya Mohmed Amzath

Bibliographic record

VenueCureus · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAntiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineConventional PCIPercutaneous coronary interventionP2Y12ClopidogrelInternal medicineTicagrelorCardiologyAspirinMyocardial infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is the standard approach for preventing ischemic events following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI); however, the associated bleeding risk has led to growing interest in P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after an initial DAPT period. This systematic review evaluates the efficacy and safety of monotherapy with ticagrelor, clopidogrel, or prasugrel following one to three months of initial DAPT, compared to prolonged DAPT regimens. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, identifying randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and high-quality comparative studies published within the last five years. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool for RCTs and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for post-hoc analyses. Primary outcomes included major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and clinically significant bleeding. Monotherapy was associated with a lower incidence of major bleeding (hazard ratio (HR) range: 0.35-0.66) while maintaining comparable ischemic outcomes, with reported MACE HRs ranging from 0.54 to 1.14. Ticagrelor monotherapy showed consistent bleeding reduction, particularly in high-risk populations, whereas clopidogrel demonstrated similar cardiovascular efficacy and a favorable safety profile in select cohorts. Efficacy and safety outcomes varied across studies depending on the agent used and patient characteristics, and moderate between-study heterogeneity was observed in trial design, populations, and outcome definitions. These findings support the use of individualized antiplatelet strategies, with P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy emerging as a viable option for reducing bleeding risk without compromising ischemic protection in appropriately selected post-PCI patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.029
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.029
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0110.011
Bibliometrics0.0070.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCureusSame topicAntiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular DiseasesFrench-language works237,207