Genetic findings of children with congenital heart diseases using chromosomal microarray and trio-based whole exome sequencing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Congenital heart disease (CHD) is the most common type of birth defects in humans. Genetic factors have been identified as an important contributor to the etiology of CHD. However, the underlying genetic causes in most individuals remain unclear. Here, 101 individuals with CHD and their unaffected parents were included in this study. Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) as a first-tier clinical diagnostic tool was applied for all affected individuals, followed by trio-based whole exome sequencing (WES) of 76 probands and proband-only WES of 3 probands. We detected aneuploidies in 2 individuals (trisomy 21 and monosomy X), 21 pathogenic and likely pathogenic copy number variants (CNVs) in 19 individuals, and pathogenic and likely pathogenic SNVs/InDels in 8 individuals. The combined genetic diagnostic yield was 28.7%, including 20.8% with chromosomal abnormalities and 7.9% with sequence-level variants. Eighteen CNVs in 17 individuals were associated with 13 recurrent chromosomal microdeletion/microduplication syndromes, the most common being 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. Pathogenic/likely pathogenic sequence-level variants were identified in 8 genes, including GATA6 , FLNA , KANSL1 , TRAF7, KAT6A , PKD1L1 , RIT1 , and SMAD6 . Trio sequencing facilitated the identification of pathogenic variation (55.6% were de novo missense variants). In individuals with extracardiac features, the overall detection rate was significantly higher (61.5%) than in individuals with isolated CHD (17.3%) ( P = 4.6 × 10 − 3 ). Our study further emphasized the importance of combining CMA and trio-WES for clinical genetic testing of individuals with CHD. Trio-based WES should be part of the diagnostic algorithm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".