Faraday Cage Estimation of Normals for Point Clouds and Ribbon Sketches
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We propose a novel method (FaCE) for normal estimation of unoriented point clouds and VR ribbon sketches that leverages a modeling of the Faraday cage effect. Input points, or a sampling of the ribbons, form a conductive cage and shield the interior from external fields. The gradient of the maximum field strength over external field scenarios is used to estimate a normal at each input point or ribbon. The electrostatic effect is modeled with a simple Poisson system, accommodating intuitive user-driven sculpting via the specification of point charges and Faraday cage points. On inputs sampled from clean, watertight meshes, our method achieves comparable normal quality to existing methods tailored for this scenario. On inputs containing interior structures and artifacts, our method produces superior surfacing output when combined with Poisson Surface Reconstruction. In the case of ribbon sketches, our method accommodates sparser ribbon input while maintaining an accurate geometry, allowing for greater flexibility in the artistic process. We demonstrate superior performance to an existing approach for surfacing ribbon sketches in this sparse setting.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".