MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4412674175 · doi:10.1101/2025.07.24.666583

The Ski2 helicase ASCC3 unwinds DNA upon fork stalling to control replication stress responses

2025· preprint· en· W4412674175 on OpenAlexaff
Shixin Cui, Nicole L. Batenburg, Yan Coulombe, Aruna Arumugam, John R. Walker, Sadaf Valeh Sheida, Anja‐Katrin Bielinsky, M.C. Wahl, Jean‐Yves Masson, Xu‐Dong Zhu

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDNA Repair Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsHôpital de l'Enfant-JésusMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHelicaseCell biologyDNA replicationBiologyRAD51Replication protein AReplication factor CDNA damageOrigin recognition complexProtein subunitGeneticsControl of chromosome duplicationDNADNA-binding proteinEukaryotic DNA replicationGeneTranscription factorRNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The activating signal co-integrator 1 complex subunit 3 (ASCC3), the largest subunit of ASCC, is one of two Ski2-like helicases with duplicated helicase cassettes encoded by the human genome. ASCC3 has been implicated in transcriptional regulation, alkylation damage repair, and ribosome quality control. In addition, published proteomics studies suggest that ASCC3 is associated with stalled forks. However, little is known about its role in replication stress. Here we report that ASCC3 is recruited to stalled forks by its binding partner ASCC2, whose recruitment to stalled forks is dependent upon both its ubiquitin binding activity and polyubiquitylation of PCNA at K164 that is catalyzed by SHPRH, HLTF, and RFWD3. In response to replication stress. ASCC3 unwinds DNA, generating both parental and nascent ssDNA. This unwinding activity is required to promote fork reversal. We demonstrate that ASCC3 also interacts with RPA and stimulates RPA accumulation on ssDNA upon replication stress, promoting ATR activation. Furthermore, ASCC3 functions to antagonize RAD51-mediated recombination and prevents accumulation of chromosome breaks/gaps and mis-segregation in response to replication stress. Our work underscores a previously uncharacterized but critical role of ASCC3 in controlling multiple replication stress responses to maintain genomic stability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicDNA Repair Mechanisms→French-language works237,207→