MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412676730 · doi:10.1080/08911762.2025.2533915

Global Marketplace (Marketing) Literacy for Sustainable Development

2025· article· en· W4412676730 on OpenAlexaff
Madhu Viswanathan, Gaurav Sinha, Edem Kwame Mensah Klobodu, Shubham Kumar Sinha

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Global Marketing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicEthics in Business and Education
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMarketingLiteracyBusinessSustainable developmentAdvertisingPublic relationsEconomicsPolitical scienceEconomic growth

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We describe the journey of marketplace literacy around the globe to derive lessons for global marketing. Marketplace literacy is fundamentally rooted in the discipline of marketing, which is the first layer of the onion, so to speak, that is essential for those with low income to participate in the marketplace. We describe the evolution of the social enterprise of marketplace literacy that has reached more than 100,000 individuals in four continents. The design, delivery, growth, and scaling of marketplace literacy offer important lessons for global marketing research, education, and practice, and ultimately sustainable development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.051
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.129
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.356
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0510.129
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.412
Teacher spread0.366 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Global MarketingSame topicEthics in Business and EducationFrench-language works237,207