MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412685127 · doi:10.3329/cbmj.v14i2.83321

Coronary Artery Ectasia with Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Case Report

2025· article· en· W4412685127 on OpenAlexaff
Tofayel Ahmed, Md Tariqul Islam Khan, AHM Hasan, Shayla Shahadat

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunity Based Medical Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicKawasaki Disease and Coronary Complications
Canadian institutionsCommunity Based Research Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoronary artery ectasiaEctasiaCardiologyMedicineInternal medicineMyocardial infarctionArteryCoronary angiography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Coronary artery ectasia (CAE), a rare condition characterized by abnormal dilation of the coronary arteries, has increasingly been recognized as a potential risk factor for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). While CAE is often asymptomatic, it can predispose individuals to thrombus formation, leading to occlusions and subsequent myocardial damage. Our case is a 36-year-old male with no prior medical problem who presented with chest pain and shortness of breath and was diagnosed as a non-STEMI. The coronary angiogram revealed multiple ectatic segments in the coronary artery with 100% stenosis in the circumflex branch. Coronary artery ectasia represents an emerging risk factor for acute myocardial infarction. The complex relationship between these two conditions is essential for improving diagnosis, prevention, and treatment strategies. Presentation of CAE is usually asymptomatic but when present with occlusive symptoms, management is guided by the extent of occlusion similar to coronary artery disease. CBMJ 2025 July: vol. 14 no. 02 P:193-197

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0070.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommunity Based Medical JournalSame topicKawasaki Disease and Coronary ComplicationsFrench-language works237,207