MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412685953 · doi:10.1503/cmaj.250356

Levothyroxine treatment for subclinical hypothyroidism and risk of adverse renal outcomes: a population-based cohort study

2025· article· en· W4412685953 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Oriana Hoi Yun Yu, Christopher Filliter, Kristian B. Filion, Robert W. Platt, Roland Grad, Mona Vahidi Rad, Christel Renoux

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Medical Association Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicThyroid Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityJewish General HospitalMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubclinical infectionLevothyroxineMedicineCohortPopulationCohort studyAdverse effectPediatricsInternal medicineHormoneEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Subclinical hypothyroidism has been linked to adverse renal outcomes, but it is unknown whether treatment of subclinical hypothyroidism reduces the risk of these adverse outcomes. We sought to assess whether treatment of subclinical hypothyroidism with levothyroxine is associated with a decreased risk of developing adverse renal outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a population-based cohort study using a prevalent new-user design. Using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink in the United Kingdom, we assembled a study cohort of individuals aged 18 years and older with newly diagnosed subclinical hypothyroidism between 1998 and 2018. We matched individuals with subclinical hypothyroidism treated with levothyroxine to nontreated individuals with subclinical hypothyroidism based on age, sex, calendar time, duration of subclinical hypothyroidism, and time-conditional propensity score. We included several confounders, including data on demographics, clinical diagnoses, biochemical measures, lifestyle, and prescriptions, in the time-conditional propensity score estimate. The primary outcome was a composite end point of end-stage renal disease (requiring dialysis) and lowering of the estimated glomerular filtration rate of 50% or greater. RESULTS: We matched 76 697 individuals with subclinical hypothyroidism treated with levothyroxine to 76 697 nontreated individuals. The mean age of the study cohort was 63 years, and 77% of patients were female. During a median follow-up time of 1.6 years (levothyroxine treated: 1.0, interquartile range [IQR] 0.4-2.7, yr; nontreated: 2.5, IQR 0.9-5.7, yr), 2426 adverse renal events occurred among nontreated individuals (incidence rate 8.35, 95% confidence interval [CI] 8.02-8.69, per 1000 person-years), and 1255 adverse renal events occurred among levothyroxine-treated individuals (incidence rate 7.93, 95% CI 7.50-8.39, per 1000 person-years). Treatment with levothyroxine was not associated with the risk of adverse renal outcomes among people with subclinical hypothyroidism (adjusted hazard ratio 0.97, 95% CI 0.90-1.04). INTERPRETATION: In this population-based cohort study, there was no evidence that levothyroxine treatment of subclinical hypothyroidism reduced the risk of adverse renal outcomes. Future studies in different populations and with longer duration of follow-up are needed to confirm these findings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.987
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Medical Association JournalSame topicThyroid Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207