MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412692749 · doi:10.3390/s25154636

Discrete Unilateral Constrained Extended Kalman Filter in an Embedded System

2025· article· en· W4412692749 on OpenAlexaff
Leonardo Herrera, Rodrigo Méndez-Ramírez

Bibliographic record

VenueSensors · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInertial Sensor and Navigation
Canadian institutionsOutotec (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKalman filterExtended Kalman filterControl theory (sociology)Invariant extended Kalman filterComputer scienceFast Kalman filterEnsemble Kalman filterArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since its publication in the 1960s, the Kalman Filter (KF) has been a powerful tool in optimal state estimation. However, the KF and most of its variants have mainly focused on the state estimation of smooth systems. In this work, we propose a new algorithm called the Discrete Unilateral Constrained Extended Kalman Filter (DUCEKF) that expands the capabilities of the Extended Kalman Filter (EKF) to a class of hybrid mechanical systems known as systems with unilateral constraints. Such systems are non-smooth in position and discontinuous in velocity. Lyapunov stability theory is invoked to establish sufficient conditions for the estimation error stability of the proposed algorithm. A comparison of the proposed algorithm with the EKF is conducted in simulation through a case study to demonstrate the superiority of the DUCEKF for the state estimation tasks in this class of systems. Simulations and an experiment were developed in this case study to validate the performance of the proposed algorithm. The experiment was conducted using electronic hardware that consists of an Embedded System (ES) called "Mikromedia for dsPIC33EP" and an external DAC-12 Click board, which includes a Digital-to-Analog Converter (DAC) from Texas Instruments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.395
Threshold uncertainty score0.522

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSensorsSame topicInertial Sensor and NavigationFrench-language works237,207