MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412694452 · doi:10.1136/bmj-2024-083874

Effect of universal no-cost coverage on use of long-acting reversible contraception and all prescription contraception: population based, controlled, interrupted time series analysis

2025· article· en· W4412694452 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Laura Schummers, Lucy Cheng, Elisabet Rodriguez-Llorian, I fan Kuo, Wendy V. Norman, Amanda Black, Andrea Stucchi, Mary Helmer‐Smith, Elizabeth Nethery, Amanda Downey, G. Emmanuel Guindon, Kimberlyn McGrail, Erin A. Brennand, Sabrina Lee, Amy Metcalfe, Stirling Bryan, Elizabeth Darling, Stefania Bertazzon, Vanessa Poliquin, Nathan Nickel, Fiona Clement, Michael R. Law

Bibliographic record

VenueBMJ · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Health and Contraception
Canadian institutionsVancouver Coastal Health Research InstituteVancouver Coastal HealthMcMaster UniversityUniversity of CalgaryImpactUniversity of OttawaUniversity of British ColumbiaGovernment of British ColumbiaUniversity of ManitobaMinistry of HealthCentre for Advancing Health Outcomes
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMedical prescriptionMedicineDemographyLong-acting reversible contraceptionPopulationCohortFamily planningDeveloped countryFamily medicineEnvironmental healthResearch methodology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To estimate effects of a policy introducing universal, no-cost public coverage for prescription contraception on use in British Columbia, Canada. DESIGN: Population based, controlled, interrupted time series analysis. SETTING: 10 Canadian provinces. PARTICIPANTS: Prescription medications dispensed to reproductive aged (15-49 years) female residents of British Columbia, Canada, compared with a synthetic control derived from the nine other Canadian provinces and a population based cohort of 859 845 female individuals in British Columbia (age 15-49 years) between 1 April 2021 and 30 June 2024. INTERVENTION: Introduction of a universal contraception coverage policy in April 2023, where the public insurer pays 100% of prescription costs. OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of monthly dispensations for long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) and number of monthly dispensations for all forms of prescription contraception (including LARC), percentage of reproductive aged female residents using LARC and using all forms of prescription contraception, and the proportion of people using prescription contraception who use LARC (LARC market share). Segmented regression models were used to estimate policy effects by comparing the expected outcome values after 15 months of the policy (ie, the counterfactual, derived from trends before the policy and changes in the control) with the observed values, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) estimated using bootstrapping. RESULTS: In April 2021, 3249 (95% CI 3066 to 3391) LARC prescriptions were dispensed in British Columbia, with a declining slope trend of -17 (-30 to -7) fewer dispensed per month before the policy. Monthly LARC dispensations increased by 1050 (942 to 1487) immediately after British Columbia's policy change and saw a steady increasing trend after the policy introduction. An additional 1273 (963 to 1698) monthly LARC prescriptions were dispensed 15 months after policy implementation compared with the expected volume, representing an estimated 1.49-fold (1.34 to 1.77) increase. Dispensations for all prescription contraception (including LARC) increased by 1981 (356 to 3324) per month, representing a 1.04-fold (1.01 to 1.07) increase. Among the 859 845 female residents aged 15-49 years in the population, 9.1% were using LARC in April 2021. 15 months after the policy, 11 375 (10 273 to 13 013) more individuals were using LARC than expected without the policy, representing an additional 1.3% (1.2% to 1.5%) of the population. The policy led to an additional 1.7% (1.5% to 2.3%) of the population using any prescription contraception. 15 months after the policy, the LARC market share was 1.9% (1.2% to 2.3%) higher than expected. CONCLUSIONS: Universal, no-cost public coverage in British Columbia increased prescription contraception use overall, driven by increased LARC use. As such, cost seems to be an important contributor to contraception use and method selection at the population level.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.261
Threshold uncertainty score0.711

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMJSame topicReproductive Health and ContraceptionFrench-language works237,207