Efficacy and Safety of Extending Dosing Interval of Stapokibart in Patients with Atopic Dermatitis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract: Background: Stapokibart is a novel anti-interleukin-4 receptor α subunit monoclonal antibody approved for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) in adults. Objective: To evaluate the feasibility of extending dosing interval of stapokibart based on efficacy response in AD. Methods: In this ongoing, multicenter, open-label, single-arm trial (NCT06116565), stapokibart 300 mg was administered subcutaneously every 2 weeks (Q2W) for 12 weeks, followed by dosing interval adjustments at weeks 12 and 36. At week 12, nonresponders (failed to achieve ≥50% improvement from baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index [EASI-50]) were withdrawn, fast responders (achieved ≥75% improvement from baseline in EASI score [EASI-75] or Investigator’s Global Assessment score of 0/1 [IGA 0/1]) were extended to every 4 weeks (Q4W), and slow responders (achieved EASI-50 but not EASI-75 or IGA 0/1) continued Q2W dosing. At week 36, fast responders achieving ≥90% improvement from baseline in EASI score (EASI-90) or IGA 0/1 were further extended to every 8 weeks (Q8W) (Q2W-Q4W-Q8W group), slow responders with EASI-90 or IGA 0/1 were extended to Q4W (Q2W-Q2W-Q4W group), and others maintained their prior dosing through week 52 (Q2W-Q4W-Q4W and Q2W-Q2W-Q2W groups). Results: As of April 7, 2025, 256 and 200 patients completed 12 and 36 weeks of treatment, respectively. In the Q2W-Q4W-Q8W group, 93.0%, 73.7%, and 70.7% of patients sustained EASI-75, IGA 0/1, and ≥4-point reduction in weekly average of daily Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale at week 52, versus 99.2%, 90.1%, and 71.1% at week 36, and 98.3%, 54.5%, and 58.3% at week 12. These response rates in the Q2W-Q4W-Q4W group were 96.2%, 23.1%, and 38.5% at week 12, versus 81.8%, 63.6%, and 72.7% at week 52. In the Q2W-Q2W-Q4W group, these responses were achieved in 95.8%, 83.3%, and 77.3% of patients at week 36, increasing to 100%, 80.0%, and 80.0% at week 52. In the Q2W-Q2W-Q2W group, 84.6%, 23.1%, and 71.4% of patients progressively achieved these responses at week 52 with continued standard dosing. The overall incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was 78.6%, mostly mild or moderate. Conclusion: Extending dosing interval of stapokibart based on efficacy response demonstrated sustained efficacy and favorable safety in AD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".