MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412700013 · doi:10.11159/ffhmt25.166

Dilute Viscoelastic Fluids for Enhanced Heat Transfer in Immersion Cooling Concepts

2025· article· en· W4412700013 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Joseph Rosenfeld, Mehdi Seddiq, Bastian Rüppel, Lukas Weiß, Hendrik Reese, Ioannis K. Karathanassis, Timothy J. Smith, G.M. Brown, Michael Wensing, Manolis Gavaises

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the ... International Conference on Fluid Flow, Heat and Mass Transfer · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHeat Transfer and Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
KeywordsImmersion (mathematics)Materials scienceViscoelasticityHeat transferHeat transfer fluidThermodynamicsComposite materialPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Viscoelastic fluids are promising candidates for the thermal management of high heat-flux components of electrified powertrains, such as the battery pack via immersion cooling concepts.This study investigates the ability of viscoelasticity-inducing additives to manipulate flow patterns and enhance heat transfer in a benchmark bluff body geometry, under inertial laminar flows using dilute polymer solutions.Simulations were conducted in OpenFOAM to model viscoelastic fluid flow using the Phan-Thien-Tanner (PTT) constitutive equation and were validated against particle image velocimetry (PIV) experimental data.Two benchmark-flow configurations were studied: (i) a 180-degree channel bend and (ii) flow around a heated bluff body.Results show that viscoelastic fluids enhance vorticity in both geometries to varying extents compared to Newtonian fluids, as a function of the PTT-model slip () parameter.Heat transfer studies with a heated bluff body showed a trend of increasing heat flux for the viscoelastic fluid, with a measurable 3% enhancement at a Reynolds number of 800 also captured by the numerical results.The study highlights the potential of leveraging the influence of second normal stress difference in viscoelastic fluids for thermal management and discusses avenues for further optimisation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.338
Threshold uncertainty score0.868

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the ... International Conference on Fluid Flow, Heat and Mass TransferSame topicHeat Transfer and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207