MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412705523 · doi:10.1117/12.3075137

The INAF/OPSys facility: a unique laboratory for integration and testing of space instrumentation and small-payload systems

2025· article· en· W4412705523 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Davide Loreggia, Silvano Fineschi, Gerardo Capobianco, L. Zangrilli, G. Nicolini, Federico Landini, Valeria Caracci, M. Pancrazzi, Hervé Haudemand, G. Massone

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPlanetary Science and Exploration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPayload (computing)Instrumentation (computer programming)Aerospace engineeringIntegration testingSpace (punctuation)Systems engineeringSpace researchComputer scienceNuclear engineeringPhysicsEngineeringOperating systemSoftware

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Optical Payload Systems (OPSys) facility is a controlled environment laboratory of the Italian National Institute for Astrophysics (INAF), sited at ALTEC S.p.A in Turin, Italy, designed and engineered for the integration and testing of contamination sensitive optical space flight instrumentation. It consists of a 100m2 area divided in 3 zones with different cleanliness level: a control room at ISO8 level, an operation room at ISO7 level and the integration and testing room at ISO5 level. This latter area houses an optical bench where operating the core activity. The bench can be closed with a dedicated tank and put under vacuum conditions, down to 10-6 bar, with environmental and instrumental thermal control. The facility was realized especially for testing solar instruments like coronagraphs with a solar source in combination with an off-axis parabolic mirror collimating the light to have the same solar angular divergence. This makes the OPSys unique in Europe with only another equivalent in the world at the Naval Research Laboratory in Washington DC. In recent years, the facility was the stage for the integration and the calibration of instrument on board of important mission of the European Space Agency (ESA) and of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) such as METIS/Solar Orbiter, ASPIICS/PROBA-3, and CODEX. Besides, the coronagraphs AntarctiCor and CorMag of the INAF have been qualified and tested for operating in Antarctica and on a stratospheric balloon, respectively. The OPSys also hosted the test for the study and the characterization of the SailCor prototype (Phase A study), a compact coronagraph for a CubeSat mission flying on a solar sail platform. Moreover, the facility activity is part of the program for the proposed study and development of the prototype for the SELENE mission, a CubeSat platform proposed for boarding an imager that will observe the solar corona orbiting the Moon and using the Moon limb as solar occulter. Besides the use for testing coronagraph, the OPSys facility is equipped with several GSE that make it versatile for supporting integration and test on different type of space instrumentation and payloads. In this paper, we present the facility, its involvement in the scientific programme of the INAF, and its potential for supporting several testing opportunities within national and international collaborations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPlanetary Science and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207