Brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels and oxidative stress in autism: evidence from children and a mouse model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) is a key factor in neurodevelopment of autism spectrum disorder (ASD), yet the variability of peripheral BDNF levels in ASD remains debated. We sought to investigate the relationship between circulating oxidative stress and peripheral BDNF in children with ASD. Methods: We analyzed plasma BDNF levels and redox status in both plasma and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) among children with ASD and typically developing (TD) children aged 2–5 years. We generated an autism-like mouse model via prenatal exposure to medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA). To modulate circulating redox balance, we employed tyrosine kinase–driven lentiviral expression of superoxide dismutase 2 ( Sod2) and hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplantation with Sod2 overexpression. We then assessed circulating redox balance, gene expression, epigenetic changes, peripheral BDNF levels, and autism-like behaviours in offspring. Results: We included 78 children in the ASD group and 63 children in the TD group. Children with ASD exhibited elevated plasma BDNF levels and an altered redox balance compared with TD controls. In the mouse model, MPA-exposed autism-like offspring demonstrated increased peripheral BDNF levels and heightened oxidative stress in hematopoietic stem cells, endothelial cells, and PBMCs. Tyrosine kinase– Sod2 lentiviral expression in the endothelium fully normalized peripheral BDNF levels, while HSC transplantation with Sod2 overexpression not only reduced plasma BDNF levels, but also alleviated autism-like behaviours. Limitations: This study’s cross-sectional data limit causal inference between oxidative stress and BDNF levels among children with ASD. The mouse model, while informative, may not fully recapitulate human ASD heterogeneity. Conclusion: In ASD, elevated peripheral BDNF levels are associated with circulating oxidative stress. Prenatal progestin exposure induces both increased peripheral BDNF and oxidative stress, effects that can be completely reversed through SOD2 modulation in circulation among mouse offspring.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".