MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412708378 · doi:10.1186/s12870-025-07007-6

Candidate gene identification and marker development for seed coat peeling rate in peanut (Arachis Hypogaea L.)

2025· article· en· W4412708378 on OpenAlexaff
Ziqi Sun, Feiyan Qi, Xiao Wang, Meng Zhang, Juan Wang, Xiaobo Wang, Ziqiang Mo, Mingbo Zhao, Chenyang Zhi, Mengmeng Wang, Zhi‐Yuan Zhou, Linhong Xu, Wenzhao Dong, Zheng Zheng, Xinyou Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Plant Biology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPeanut Plant Research Studies
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Agriculture
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaHenan Academy of Agricultural Sciences
KeywordsBiologyQuantitative trait locusSingle-nucleotide polymorphismGeneticsLinkage disequilibriumArachis hypogaeaCandidate genePopulationGenome-wide association studyLocus (genetics)ArachisGenetic linkageGenotypeGeneAgronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) is an important economic and oilseed crop in China. The seed coat plays a crucial role in resisting pests and diseases, and seed coat peeling rate (SCPR) is a key factor influencing the efficiency and quality of mechanical shelling. Given the high kernel breakage rate and susceptibility to Aspergillus flavus infection during mechanical shelling, gene mining for SCPR holds significant theoretical and practical value. However, the genetic basis of SCPR has rarely been reported. RESULTS: This study represented the first identification of genetic loci associated with SCPR in peanut. A genome-wide association study (GWAS) was conducted on a natural population comprising 353 peanut accessions, while quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping was performed using a recombinant inbred line (RIL) population of 521 lines derived from YZ9102 and WT09-0023. GWAS analysis revealed a significantly associated genomic region at the distal end of chromosome 5, encompassing 111 significant single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), among which six SNPs were consistently detected across two environments and exhibited strong linkage with SCPR. QTL mapping identified five QTLs associated with SCPR, located on chromosomes A04, A05, A09, A10, and A18, with LOD scores ranging from 3.06 to 5.54. Notably, the co-localization of GWAS signals and QTL mapping at the distal end of chromosome 5 suggests that qSCPRA05 represents a stable and major QTL governing SCPR in peanut, spanning a 385.66 kb physical interval (Arahy.05:114,895,772 - 115,281,432). Within this region, three linkage disequilibrium (LD) blocks were detected, harboring 33 candidate genes. Among them, Arahy.0C6ZNN, which encodes laccase, was identified as the most likely candidate gene through integration of sequence variation analysis between the RIL parental lines and functional gene annotation. Furthermore, a functional marker A05.114993389 was developed and validated in both the natural and RIL populations, providing a valuable genomic resource for marker-assisted selection (MAS) in peanut breeding programs. CONCLUSIONS: This study represented the gene mining of SCPR in peanut, providing novel insights into its genetic basis and laying a foundation for elucidating the underlying regulatory mechanisms. The identification of a major QTL qSCPRA05 and the candidate gene Arahy.0C6ZNN may offer valuable targets for further functional research. Moreover, the development of molecular markers linked to SCPR presents a promising tool for marker-assisted selection (MAS), facilitating genetic improvement and accelerating breeding efforts for enhanced seed coat integrity in peanut.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC Plant BiologySame topicPeanut Plant Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207