MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Clinical Characterization of a Multicenter International Cohort of Patients With Aicardi-Goutières Syndrome Homozygous for the RNASEH2B:p.Ala177Thr Variant: Early Clinical Markers of Disease Severity

2025· article· en· W4412714215 on OpenAlexaff
Costanza Varesio, Davide Politano, Laura Adang, Elena Ballante, Roberta Battini, Enrico Bertini, Renato Borgatti, Valentina De Giorgis, Anca Boca, Francesca Dragoni, Elisa Fazzi, Jessica Galli, Jessica Garau, Francesco Gavazzi, Alice Gardani, Roberta La Piana, Isabella Moroni, Francesco Nicita, Anna Pichiecchio, Antonella Pini, Federica Ricci, Stefano Sartori, Davide Tonduti, Adeline Vanderver, Simona Orcesi

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric Neurology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
Topicinterferon and immune responses
Canadian institutionsMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
FundersIstituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Policlinico San DonatoNational Institutes of HealthNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeMinistero della Salute
KeywordsCohortMedicineDiseasePediatricsInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Aicardi-Goutières syndrome (AGS) is a rare monogenic leukodystrophy belonging to type I interferonopathies caused by alterations in one of nine genes. Among them, homozygous RNASEH2B:c.529G>A(p.Ala177Thr) is the most common variant worldwide and associated to AGS2. This variant typically leads to severe phenotypes, but individuals with later onset or milder clinical manifestations have been described, with recent finding of asymptomatic homozygous individuals. However, the cause for this intragenotypic clinical variability is unclear, as well as developmental trajectories and early prognostic factors. Our study objective is the description of phenotypic variability in patients with AGS2 and the identification of early clinical markers of prognosis. METHODS: A multicenter international retrospective natural history study was carried out by recruiting patients with AGS homozygous for p.Ala177Thr variant. Patients were categorized into three groups based on the clinical severity through the composite functional severity score, although comparison was made with the more recently introduced AGS severity score. Disease onset was divided into neonatal, infantile, and later onset. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were collected and compared between these groups. RESULTS: Irritability at onset correlates significantly to the three functional categories. Early age at onset and presence of extrapyramidal signs correlate to functional outcomes when comparing mild with severe patients. Furthermore, retrospective application of AGS severity score correlated well with the commonly used composite functional severity score. CONCLUSION: The authors observed irritability, early onset, and extrapyramidal signs not to be exclusive to the severe group, hence the need for creation of a composite predictive biomarker for prognosis accuracy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venuePediatric NeurologySame topicinterferon and immune responsesFrench-language works237,207