MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412714519 · doi:10.5382/econgeo.5169

Insights Into the Magma Source and Evolution of the Taca Taca Bajo Porphyry Deposit: Implications for the Metallogeny and Cu Fertility of the Central Andean Retro Arc

2025· article· en· W4412714519 on OpenAlexaff
Madeleine Ince, Steffen G. Hagemann, Nora A. Rubinstein, Marco L. Fiorentini, Anthony I.S. Kemp, Christopher M. Fisher, Tim Ireland, Santiago Gigola

Bibliographic record

VenueEconomic Geology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsFirst Quantum Minerals (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyGeochemistryZirconContinental arcMetallogenyGeochronologyBack-arc basinSubductionMineralization (soil science)MagmaContinental crustPartial meltingPetrologyCrustTectonicsPaleontologyVolcanic rockVolcano

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The magmatic processes that lead to porphyry Cu ore formation in continental retro-arc environments are not well understood. As a result, the uncertainty of predictive exploration in these tectonic settings is elevated, and new case studies are needed to enhance the probability of success in target identification. The Taca Taca Bajo porphyry Cu-Mo-Au deposit is a well-mineralized (11.7 Mt contained Cu), retro-arc expression of the Middle Eocene to Early Oligocene metallogenic belt in the central Andes and represents a key location for investigating continental retro-arc magmatic processes that culminate in the formation of porphyry Cu deposits. Mineralization at Taca Taca Bajo is spatially and temporally correlated with a NE-SW–trending rhyodacitic porphyry dike swarm. Six samples of the mineralized Taca Taca Bajo rhyodacite porphyry and one of the barren west rhyodacite porphyry were analyzed for whole-rock geochemistry and zircon petrochronology (U-Pb geochronology, O isotopes, Lu-Hf isotopes, trace element geochemistry). The U-Pb SHRIMP analyses of zircons from the Taca Taca rhyodacite porphyry intrusions reveal ages ranging from 30.3 ± 0.5 Ma to 29.1 ± 0.3 Ma (95% confidence interval). The barren west rhyodacite porphyry sample yields an overlapping zircon crystallization age of 30.4 ± 0.4 Ma (U-Pb SHRIMP; 95% confidence interval) with mineralized samples. Whole-rock geochemistry reveals a subducted slab component to the magma, with enrichments in Ba and Th as well as a marked negative Nb and Ta anomaly. The mean zircon δ18O of both the barren and mineralized Oligocene intrusions ranges from 5.6 ± 0.5 to 5.8 ± 0.2‰ (2 standard deviations [SD]), and zircon εHf from 5.3 ± 2.4 to 7.6 ± 0.7 (2 SD). These similarities suggest that the mineralized and barren intrusions may have a relatively juvenile mantle-derived source with minor assimilation of older crust. Inherited zircons yield U-Pb ages of 48 to 1063 Ma, with a cluster at 230 to 280 Ma, indicative of interaction with older arc magmatic rocks of the lower Choiyoi Igneous Complex. The Taca Taca Oligocene intrusions are moderately hydrous (mean zircon Eu/Eu* = 0.25–0.34) and oxidized (mean ΔFMQ = 0.2–1.0 [FMQ = fayalite-magnetite-quartz]) as estimated from zircon-based proxies. However, they also have lower inferred H2O contents and fO2 than other Cu-porphyry deposits of the Eocene to Early Oligocene metallogenic belt (e.g., Escondida, Chuquicamata, El Salvador). Based on these data, it is possible to conclude that the Taca Taca Bajo deposit, despite being a large porphyry Cu deposit, may have failed to reach the scale of some others in the metallogenic belt because it experienced a relatively isolated, short (1–1.5 m.y.) magmatic pulse, and did not undergo the multimillion year build-up of magmatism characteristic of these major deposits.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.086
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEconomic GeologySame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207