MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412715212 · doi:10.2172/2573179

Sierra Space Technology Collaboration-Advanced Manufacturing of Thermal Protection System Tiles for Space Plane Atmospheric Reentry

2025· report· en· W4412715212 on OpenAlexaff
STEVEN BULLOCK, Ryan Fahsbender, Matthew Musselman

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSpacecraft Design and Technology
Canadian institutionsSierra Wireless (Canada)
FundersOak Ridge National LaboratoryUT-BattelleOffice of Energy EfficiencyU.S. Department of EnergyOffice of Energy Efficiency and Renewable EnergyBattelle
KeywordsSpace (punctuation)ReentryAerospace engineeringSpace Shuttle thermal protection systemPlane (geometry)ThermalEngineeringComputer scienceGeometryMeteorologyPhysicsOperating systemMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Thermal protection systems (TPS) constitute a major material, engineering, and manufacturing challenge for space access. Atmospheric re-entry generates very high heats and requires advanced materials to withstand such conditions. Combining the required materials and integrating them into the vehicle is a major engineering undertaking that often must use creative designs to accommodate the selected materials and systems. Likewise, the manufacture of TPS is costly and challenging; it requires a combination of materials in a range of complex and unique shapes with specialized process conditions. Compounding these challenges, for harsh re-entry profiles or on high heat flux regions of the vehicle, even state of the art TPS is effectively single use and thereby creating a strong economic incentive to improve the TPS materials, integration, and manufacture. This work focuses on the use of ceramic modifications to TPS materials thereby allowing multi flight capability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpacecraft Design and TechnologyFrench-language works237,207