MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412719134 · doi:10.1109/jstars.2025.3592843

XingHuan Visible and Uncooled Multispectral Infrared Camera for Wildfire Detection: Algorithm Description and Initial Validation

2025· article· en· W4412719134 on OpenAlexaff
Guoliang Tang, Chengyu Liu, Li Dong, Qian Cui, Ying Luo, Xuhui Wang, Tongxu Zhang, Fang Ding, Chunlai Li, Jianyu Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicRemote Sensing and Land Use
Canadian institutionsOptech (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultispectral imageRemote sensingInfraredComputer scienceMultispectral pattern recognitionRadiometryEnvironmental scienceArtificial intelligenceComputer visionAlgorithmOpticsPhysicsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Advancements in wildfire detection using meteorological satellite data have progressed significantly since the 1980s, driven by improved instruments and analytical algorithms. In May 2024, the XingHuan satellite, designed for wildfire monitoring, was deployed into orbit. It carries a visible-panchromatic camera and a multispectral infrared imaging system, featuring a vanadium oxide array. The system provides a 60 m spatial resolution for visible-panchromatic imaging and 120 m for both mid-wave infrared and long-wave infrared imaging, all within a 1.5 kg payload. The camera’s high resolution, five spectral bands, and time-delay integration method significantly improve the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for detecting small wildfires. However, accurate radiometric quantification of the data depends on precise temperature measurement and thermal control system of the camera, which complicates fire pixel identification. This study proposes a novel approach, the fire dual-band local contrast method (Fire-DBLCM) for fire detection, using uncalibrated raw data from the XingHuan satellite. The Fire-DBLCM method selects an optimal background based on fire’s spectral properties, improving detection sensitivity. Inspired by the human visual system, this method circumvents the conventional fire detection process, such as radiometric calibration, atmospheric correction, cloud and water pixel classification, and absolute thresholding. Integrating both mid-wave and long-wave spectral bands further enhances the SNR compared to single band-dependent initial data and conventional local contrast method approaches. We evaluate the Fire-DBLCM’s performance by comparing its results with data from medium-resolution satellite sensors (MODIS and VIIRS) and high-resolution satellites (Landsat-8/9 and Sentinel-2). The findings indicate that the Fire-DBLCM algorithm identifies smaller wildfires more effectively than medium-resolution satellites and detects residual heat signatures more sensitively than high-resolution satellites. The smallest fires identified were$< $700 m2during the day and$< $100 m2at night, establishing a new benchmark for uncooled infrared satellite constellations with high spatiotemporal resolution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote SensingSame topicRemote Sensing and Land UseFrench-language works237,207