MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412720647 · doi:10.1080/19336950.2025.2539494

Graded activation of mutant K41C-KCNE1:KCNQ1 channel complexes by mefenamic acid

2025· article· en· W4412720647 on OpenAlexafffund
Yundi Wang, Magnus Chan, Marc Pourrier, Jodene Eldstrom, David Fedida

Bibliographic record

VenueChannels · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaHeart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
KeywordsMefenamic acidMutantChemistryChannel (broadcasting)BiophysicsBiochemistryCell biologyBiologyGeneComputer scienceChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The IKs current formed by the co-assembly of KCNE1 and KCNQ1 plays an important role in cardiac repolarization. Mefenamic acid, an NSAID, is known to enhance IKs currents and has in turn been suggested as a therapeutic starting point for the development of compounds for the treatment of long QT syndrome. Our previous examinations of mefenamic acid’s action revealed that residue K41 on KCNE1 was critical for mefenamic acid’s activating effect on fully KCNE1 saturated, and partially saturated IKs channel complexes. The present study extends our previous work by incorporating the K41C-KCNE1 mutation into individual subunits to destabilize local mefenamic acid binding and explore how many of the remaining mefenamic acid-bound WT KCNE1-KCNQ1 subunits are required to support the activating action of the drug. Our results show that the potency of mefenamic acid action is reduced by the presence of K41C-KCNE1 subunits in a graded and stoichiometric, but non-linear manner. Modeling results are consistent with the idea that WT IKs subunits, in the presence of mefenamic acid, precede activation of K41C-IKs subunits due to their augmented voltage sensor kinetics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.616

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChannelsSame topicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasFrench-language works237,207