SGNDV-001: disitamab vedotin with pembrolizumab in HER2-expressing locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Platinum-based chemotherapy for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC), has been the first-line standard of care for many decades. Enfortumab vedotin, an antibody-drug conjugate, combined with pembrolizumab, a programmed death 1 (PD-1) inhibitor, recently demonstrated improved efficacy versus chemotherapy in la/mUC. Since 60%-80% of patients with UC have tumors expressing human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), HER2-directed vedotin-based antibody-drug conjugates may also be beneficial in la/mUC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The phase 3 trial SGNDV-001 (C5731001; NCT05911295) is evaluating disitamab vedotin (HER2-directed antibody-drug conjugate) with pembrolizumab compared with chemotherapy in treatment-naive patients with HER2-expressing la/mUC. Dual primary endpoints are progression-free survival (per blinded independent central review) and overall survival. Potential synergistic effects of disitamab vedotin and pembrolizumab could establish this combination as a novel therapeutic option for HER2-expressing la/mUC.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".