MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412729069 · doi:10.1186/s12870-025-06929-5

The path effects of a bacterial signal compound on the microbiome of canola

2025· article· en· W4412729069 on OpenAlexaff
Bulbul Ahmed, Mahtab Nazari, Jean Legeay, Timothy Schwinghamer, Mohamed Hijri, Donald L. Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Plant Biology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaMcGill University
FundersCustody X Change
KeywordsBiologyCanolaPath (computing)MicrobiomeComputational biologySIGNAL (programming language)BiotechnologyGeneticsBotanyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Bacillin 201 has been shown to act as a biostimulant, it enhances seed germination and increases the biomass of soybean and canola plants. However, the mechanisms underlying these benefits, and their impacts on the plant-associated microbiome, remain unquantified. In this study, we investigated the causal effects of bacillin 20 on the bacterial communities associated with canola. RESULTS: We conducted a field study with three different concentrations of bacillin 20 as seed treatment and foliar spray on canola cultivar InVigor L233P followed by a randomized complete block design in clay loam and sandy loam soils and investigated how bacillin 20 influences the structure and richness of bacterial communities across biotypes, including those in root tissues and rhizosphere soil. Our findings revealed that rhizosphere soil bacterial communities clustered closely in the studied clay loam soil. Bacterial alpha diversity did not respond significantly to bacillin 20 treatments, however, Rhizobiales bacteria become most abundant in the rhizosphere soil. Also, four bacteria- Rosemicrobium sp., Sphingomonas sp. and two unclassified Planctomycetes were identified as indicator species in the microbial communities from both clay-loam and sandy-loam soils. We analysed causal relationships between the effects of bacillin 20 and experimentally controlled factors affecting bacterial communities, such as those associated with root tissue, soil and treatment (bacillin 20) types. Some bacterial taxa—ASV55 (Candidatus Xiphinematobacter) were negatively affected by bacillin 20 foliar treatment, and ASV73 (unidentified Tepidisphaerales) by seed treatment. CONCLUSION: Overall, our study revealed key explanatory variables influencing the effect of bacillin 20 on the bacterial communities associated with canola roots and rhizosphere soil. Although soil type (clay versus sandy loam) did not directly affect the bacterial communities, we found that bacillin 20 affected the canola root system associated microbiota. This shifts in the associated bacteria could be influenced by developmental stages, not by the treatment of bacillin 20 alone.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.195
Threshold uncertainty score0.140

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC Plant BiologySame topicPlant-Microbe Interactions and ImmunityFrench-language works237,207