MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412730540 · doi:10.1002/suco.70269

Behavior of post tensioned concrete slabs with various strenghening techniques

2025· article· en· W4412730540 on OpenAlex
Hany Abdalla, Asmaa Hamdy, Ghada Diaa Abdelhamed, Ahmed Elansary

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueStructural Concrete · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStructural engineeringEngineeringForensic engineeringMaterials scienceGeotechnical engineeringCivil engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Strengthening post‐tensioned (PT) slabs is essential for enhancing their load‐carrying capacity and overall structural performance in a wide range of practical applications. This study investigates the effectiveness of two strengthening techniques—external reinforced concrete (RC) jacketing and carbon fiber‐reinforced polymer (CFRP) reinforcement—through both experimental testing and numerical modeling. Five one‐way PT slabs were fabricated and tested under four‐point bending, comprising one control specimen and two specimens for each strengthening method. The effects of varying the reinforcement mesh configuration in the RC jacket and the number of CFRP layers were examined. Key performance indicators, including crack patterns, midspan deflection, and ultimate load capacity, were recorded during testing. Experimental failure loads were compared with predictions from international design codes. The results indicated that PT slabs strengthened with RC jacketing exhibited load capacities exceeding those predicted by AS 3600, ACI 318, and Eurocode 2 by 2.7%–19.7%, while CFRP‐strengthened slabs showed improvements ranging from 6.9% to 12.9%. A robust finite element model (FEM) was developed and validated against the experimental data, incorporating the nonlinear behavior of concrete, steel reinforcement, prestressing tendons, and CFRP. A comprehensive parametric study, involving 54 numerical simulations, was conducted to evaluate the influence of critical parameters on the load capacity of strengthened slabs. The results demonstrated that increasing the yield strength and diameter of the jacketing reinforcement, as well as the compressive strength of the jacketing concrete, significantly enhanced load capacity. Furthermore, increasing the number of CFRP strips improved the performance of strengthened slabs by 3.4%–18.9%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it