Staying Alive: Individual Behavioral Variation Influences Survival, but Not Reproductive Success, in Female Group‐Living Ground Squirrels
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Animals living in harsh or unpredictable environments adopt adaptive strategies to improve their fitness, with behavioral variation playing a key role in shaping individual outcomes. We examined whether between‐individual variation in behavioral traits (personality) was associated with reproductive success and survival in female Cape ground squirrels ( Xerus inauris ). Using a 10‐year dataset (2011–2021), we quantified behavioral expressions of the animal's response to trapping and handling (trap response, as a proxy for docility), trapping rate (trappability, for boldness) and the number of different trapping locations an animal was trapped at (trap diversity, for exploration) and examined their associations with (1) annual reproductive success, (2) lifetime reproductive success, (3) annual survival, and (4) on‐site persistence (a proxy for lifespan). Response measures taken during transfer from the cage, handling by a human observer, and whether individuals ran or walked after release were moderately repeatable. Trappability was also repeatable, while trap diversity was not. Trap response and trappability were positively correlated with survival, but not reproductive success. Females that easily transferred from the trap to the handling bag (more docile) had higher annual survival, while those that ran after release had longer lifespans. Individuals trapped at a higher rate (bolder) had higher annual survival. The absence of a relationship between behavioral traits and reproductive success in females suggests that other factors, such as group dynamics, social interactions, and maternal effects, may be more influential in explaining the high reproductive skew in female reproductive success. Overall, our findings highlight the role of individual behavioral variation in shaping survival outcomes while emphasizing the need for further research into the mechanisms driving reproductive success in this species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".