MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412734554 · doi:10.1163/15700577-20252928

Gold Pendants in the Form of Lion Heads from the Burials of the Last Quarter of the 5th Century BC from the Necropoleis of the Taman Peninsula

2025· article· en· W4412734554 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Мikhail Treister, Н.И. Сударев

Bibliographic record

VenueAncient Civilizations from Scythia to Siberia · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMetallurgy and Cultural Artifacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)PeninsulaAncient historyArchaeologyArtGeographyHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper focuses on the publication of gold pendants in the form of lion heads of the 5th century BC from the necropoleis of the Taman Peninsula. These pieces of jewellery belong to the most common type of gold pendants in the shape of animal heads, which are also represented by items in the form of bull and ram heads. The published pendants of all three groups are presented as a short catalogue in Appendices 1–3. They were widespread from Southern Italy and Sicily in the West, to Rhodes, Euboea, Macedonia, Thasos and Thrace, to Olbia and the Bosporan kingdom, as well as the Kuban region, in the East. The attention that is attracted by the finds from the Taman Peninsula is explained by the fact that they all come from excavations of necropoleis, from the burial complexes which can be reliably dated by the black-glazed pottery. Probably the earliest find is from the necropolis of Eretria, if the dating of the complex to the first quarter of the 5th century BC is correct. It is obvious that pendants in the form of bull and ram heads also appeared at the same time, judging by their use as elements of necklaces from the burials of the same cemetery. In the North Pontic region, the earliest sample in the form of a lion head is a find from grave No. 10/1913 of the necropolis of Olbia, which may date back to the second, or rather the third quarter of the 5th century BC . The pendants from the contexts of the Taman Peninsula, presented in the paper, can be dated to the last quarter of the same century and even to the turn of the 5th–4th centuries BC . In the late 5th century BC , such jewellery appeared in Tarentum, where they became widespread in the following century. On the whole, it is obvious that all pendants are to some extent individual and stylistic features do not allow us to speak of one or another center of their manufacture. Rather this can be evidenced by their findplaces, which show a fairly distinct concentration of pendants in Southern Italy, primarily in Tarentum, and in the North Pontic region, in Olbia, and especially in the Bosporan Kingdom.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.611
Threshold uncertainty score0.974

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAncient Civilizations from Scythia to SiberiaSame topicMetallurgy and Cultural ArtifactsFrench-language works237,207