Remimazolam for Procedural Sedation During Cardioversion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Remimazolam is a benzodiazepine with sedative, anxiolytic, and amnestic properties similar to those of midazolam. However, its elimination is novel as it undergoes metabolism by tissue esterases with a half-life of 5 - 10 min and a limited context-sensitive half-life, thereby resulting in a rapid dissolution of its clinical effects. Initial clinical work has demonstrated its efficacy for the induction of general anesthesia, as an adjunct to maintenance anesthesia, and for procedural sedation. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed our experience with the use of remimazolam for sedation during cardioversion in adult patients. Results: The study cohort included six patients, ranging in age from 22 to 68 years. Intravenous remimazolam was the primary agent for all procedures. All six patients received a single bolus dose of remimazolam while two patients received a continuous infusion after the bolus dose. Two patients received adjunctive agents (fentanyl 100 µg). No clinically significant respiratory or hemodynamic adverse effects were noted in any patient. Adequate amnesia was achieved as none of the six patients recalled the cardioversion. Conclusion: Our preliminary experience demonstrates that remimazolam may be an effective agent for sedation during cardioversion without significant impact on hemodynamic or respiratory function. In adult patients, a single 5 mg bolus dose of remimazolam provided effective amnesia and sedation for the procedure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".