MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412746765 · doi:10.3138/ngcr.15-006

Stonecroft Lecture 2023 / Conférence Stonecroft 2023

2025· article· fr· W4412746765 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Maria Hupfield

Bibliographic record

VenueNational Gallery of Canada Review · 2025
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAstrobiologyEnvironmental sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This is Maria Hupfield on Maria Hupfield. And I amThe respect for the space, the materials, even the land Maria Hupfield.I generally prefer to have curators that the galleries are on.Take that a step further, talk about my work, but you have the pleasure number two: responsibility.Who are you?Who tonight of having me here in the flesh.are we responsible to, and for, and why?There is an I have a radical thought, a proposition, exchanging of things for mutual benefit, especially for for you.It's obvious once I say it, but I don't think privileges.When we are in this space, it is not just a it has been been said.What if we think about an art passive thing.It is an involved thing.I like this one: form and an art history that doesn't come fromreverence, sacred number four.We hear about this in this is going to go against all my training in art art through the sacred and the profane, and I like to school -that doesn't come from Egypt, Greece, think about it, because it makes room to enter a space and Rome?What about an art and an art history where I also think about spirit.My own spirit, my that is more expansive in the sense that it's coming spirituality, and that there are also items or ideas that from, of all places, here in North America?We're may be regarded with reverence.The next one: holhere.What about the land that we're on?Taking ism.This idea of an interconnection, that when we that a little bit further -what if literature and go into a gallery, we bring with us our full bodies.writing wasn't coming from, or invented by, the Historically galleries are not necessarily seen that British, that it wasn't Shakespeare who made that, way.We are aware of our body; we are aware of our that there's other forms of literacy, other forms of mind.We are aware of education.We bring this with orality?us.But we often don't think about everything.We This is something I've been encountering in often leave behind our emotions.We leave behind my practice constantly, from the moment I started our spirit.What if we come in with all of that, and we to learn about art.How do I reconcile a history that's don't divide ourselves?Holism also makes space for very specific, and how do I fit into that?things like language reclamation and for land.Archi-With that in mind, I turn to someone who is bald talks about Indigenous storywork: there's a story very established -for the educators in the room, you to be told, there's a storyteller and a listener, and an may be already aware of this person -Dr.Jo-Ann interrelated relationship.What does it look like if I Archibald, Q'um Q'um Xiiem.She is an Indigenous bring storywork into the gallery or the studio as a pereducator and wrote a book called Indigenous Storyformance artist where there's a subject to be told, work: Educating the Heart, Mind, Body, and Spirit.there's an artist/maker, and an audience.There is an This is something I have taken up and brought into interrelatedness that happens, or the sixth element.my studio, into my practice as a performance artistWe can't necessarily change how someone is going and a maker of things.She basically proposes that to take away or interpret the work, but there is direct story is work and there are seven elements of connection.Last, seven is synergy.There is all this storywork.connection and interaction.For me, this is especially The first element has to do with respect.significant, when I think about being a performance What if we think about this idea that we are in a galartist.Synergy is taking place in live performance, lery and we are in a space where art is about respect?culturally as energy, strength, and power.I'm thinking

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.454
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNational Gallery of Canada ReviewSame topicSocial Sciences and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207