MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412748488 · doi:10.31612/2616-4868.5.2025.17

ASSOCIATION BETWEEN ADENOID HYPERTROPHY AND CHRONIC RHINOSINUSITIS IN CHILDREN: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

2025· review· en· W4412748488 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Олександр Науменко, Julia V. Deyeva, Inna Gogunska, Lilia I. Romaniuk, С. В. Зяблицев

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical and Preventive Medicine · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSinusitis and nasal conditions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChronic rhinosinusitisAdenoid hypertrophyMedicineMuscle hypertrophyAssociation (psychology)DermatologyPathologyAdenoidectomyInternal medicinePsychologyTonsillectomyPsychotherapist

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction. Adenoid hypertrophy (AH) and chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) are common pediatric conditions, with a prevalence of approximately 34% and 2–4%, respectively. The anatomical proximity of the pharyngeal tonsil to the nasal cavity and the similarity in clinical presentations raise questions regarding a potential association between these pathologies. Establishing correlations between adenoid hypertrophy and chronic rhinosinusitis may assist clinicians in early diagnosis and the implementation of individualized treatment approaches. Aim. To conduct a comprehensive evaluation and critical systematic analysis of existing scientific literature to determine the association between adenoid hypertrophy and chronic rhinosinusitis in children. Materials and methods. A systematic search was conducted in the PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases covering the period from 1975 to December 2023. The search included the Keywords: “adenoid hypertrophy,” “adenoid vegetation,” “chronic rhinosinusitis,” “chronic sinusitis.” Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. The review followed PRISMA guidelines. Results. A total of 41 studies were analyzed, with sample sizes ranging from 16 to 12,965 children (mean age 3.3–12.62 years). Shared etiological pathogens were identified, including Staphylococcus aureus, Haemophilus influenzae, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Moraxella catarrhalis. Biofilms were detected in 94.9% of CRS cases with AH compared to 1.9% in cases of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS). Elevated levels of pro-inflammatory mediators (TGF-β1, sIL-2R, MMP-2, MMP-9, TIMP-1) and decreased levels of protective factors (IgA, BLIMP-1, SP-D) were reported. Impaired mucociliary clearance was demonstrated by reduced ciliary beat frequency (5.35 ± 1.06 Hz vs. 6.37 ± 0.71 Hz in controls). Adenoidectomy showed efficacy in 47–88.3% of cases in reducing CRS symptoms. Conclusions. Most studies confirm a strong association between adenoid vegetations and chronic rhinosinusitis in children, driven by common etiopathogenetic mechanisms. Adenoidectomy may be considered a first-line treatment for uncomplicated pediatric CRS. It is proposed to classify adenoid vegetations as a distinct phenotypic subtype within pediatric CRS classification.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.030
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.030
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0080.006
Bibliometrics0.0090.011
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.402
Teacher spread0.361 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical and Preventive MedicineSame topicSinusitis and nasal conditionsFrench-language works237,207