MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412755491 · doi:10.1002/mdc3.70245

Efficacy and Safety of Foslevodopa/Foscarbidopa Monotherapy in Patients with Parkinson's Disease

2025· article· en· W4412755491 on OpenAlexaff
Jason Aldred, Manon Bouchard, Juan Carlos Martínez‐Castrillo, Michael J. Soileau, Amy M. Spiegel, Lars Bergmann, Resmi Gupta, Megha Shah, Pavnit Kukreja, David G. Standaert, Stuart Isaacson, Tove Henriksen

Bibliographic record

VenueMovement Disorders Clinical Practice · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsCégep de Lévis
FundersAbbVie
KeywordsMedicineCombination therapyRandomized controlled trialConcomitantParkinson's diseaseDyskinesiaPost-hoc analysisClinical trialRandomizationAdverse effectInternal medicineDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: As Parkinson's disease (PD) progresses, managing symptoms becomes increasingly difficult. Foslevodopa/foscarbidopa (LDp/CDp), a 24-hour/day continuous subcutaneous infusion of levodopa/carbidopa (LD/CD) prodrugs, improves motor complications. The feasibility and sustainability of LDp/CDp monotherapy warrants investigation. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to report the efficacy and safety of LDp/CDp monotherapy and combination therapy. METHODS: This post hoc analysis assessed patients with PD and ≥2.5 "Off" hours/day receiving LDp/CDp monotherapy or combination therapy in 3 trials: a 12-week randomized active-controlled trial (RCT) comparing LDp/CDp with oral immediate-release LD/CD (NCT04380142), a 52-week open-label trial of LDp/CDp (NCT03781167), and its 96-week open-label extension study (OLE; NCT04379050). Monotherapy was defined as receiving LDp/CDp without concomitant PD medications; combination therapy was defined as receiving LDp/CDp with other PD medications. RESULTS: In the RCT, 74 of 141 patients received LDp/CDp. The 52-week trial enrolled 244 patients; 129 entered the OLE. Of LDp/CDp-treated patients, 19 of 74 (25.7%) in the RCT, 49 of 244 (20.1%) in the 52-week trial, and 46 of 129 (35.7%) in the OLE received monotherapy. In the RCT, mean (standard deviation) change from baseline to week 12 in "Off" time was -4.5 (4.4) and -3.0 (3.5) hours for monotherapy and combination therapy, respectively; +4.1 (3.7) and +3.1 (3.6) hours for "On" time without troublesome dyskinesia; and +4.0 (3.6) and +4.0 (3.9) hours for "On" time without dyskinesia. Efficacy was similar in open-label trials. Improvements in the Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part II, 39-item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire, Parkinson's Disease Sleep Scale-2 scores, and overall safety were comparable between monotherapy and combination therapy groups. CONCLUSIONS: LDp/CDp monotherapy treatment may be suitable for up to 96 weeks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMovement Disorders Clinical PracticeSame topicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207