Clinical analysis of dexmedetomidine-esketamine combined with intranasal administration before laparoscopic high ligation of hernia sac in infants and young children
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Studying To investigate the clinical values of dexmedetomidine and esketamine combined with intranasal infusion before laparoscopic high ligation of hernia sacs in infants and young children. Methodology: In our hospital, 90Ninety children aged 8-14 years underwent surgical high ligation of the hernia sac between March 2021 and March 2022 were included. During March 2021 to March 2022, 90 children aged 8-14 underwent surgical high ligation of hernia sacs at our hospital. The study and control groups were divided. Each group had 45 cases. A routine fast was given to all the children before anesthesia, and they received midazolam for the contrast set and dexmedetomidine combined with esketamine for the examination set. The onset time, recovery time, sedation time and other indicators were analyzed. Results: The onset time of sedation in the study group was significantly lower than that in the control group, and the sedation time was significantly higher than that in the control group (P<0.05). The Ramsay score of the study group was significantly higher than that of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). After sedation, the Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA) scores of the study group was significantly lower than the control group (P<0.05). After sedation, the Ramsay score and MoCA score were significantly positively correlated (P<0.05). Conclusion: The use of Dexmedetomidine combined with esketamine nasal drops in infants and young children undergoing laparoscopic high ligation of hernia sac is an effective and safe sedation technique. It not only improves sedation but also reduces the incidence of adverse reactions. Furthermore, it does not impair the cognitive function of children. The combination of dexmedetomidine with esketamine intranasal instillation can improve sedation, reduce adverse reactions, and will not harm them. Clinical efficacy, safety, and cognitive function are high in children.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".