MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412756139 · doi:10.24158/spp.2025.7.1

Ethnicity through Institutions: Invisible Rules and Visible Practices on the Example of Mono-Ethnic Organization of Eskimos

2025· article· en· W4412756139 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Evgeny А. Vasilkov

Bibliographic record

VenueОбщество социология психология педагогика · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicArctic and Russian Policy Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEthnic groupSociologyAnthropology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article explores the phenomenon of ethnicity in the constructivist paradigm and its relation to the institutions of ethnic identity preservation. Using the example of the mono-ethnic organization Inuit Circumpolar Council of Chukotka (Russian office of the international Inuit Circumpolar Council), the authors analyze the mechanisms of maintaining and preserving the ethnicity of the Chukotka Eskimos. The empirical basis of the article is the results of the research, including 22 depth interviews with representatives of the Eskimos, including activists of the ICC Chukotka organization, leaders of ethno-cultural collectives, deputies and elders. The conceptual lan-guage of Kanchan Chandra, which views ethnicity through the rules of membership in an ethnic category and the attributes associated with ethnicity (language, traditions, phenotype, etc.), is used as a theoretical frame-work. The results of the study are presented, indicating that Chukotka Eskimos have no strict rules for the transmission of ethnicity through the paternal or maternal line, which is associated with traditional ideas of rein-carnation and free will. A direct correlation was found between the rule of membership in the Chukotka Eskimo ethnic category and the conditions of membership in the Inuit Circumpolar Council of Chukotka, which formally makes all Chukotka Eskimos part of the organization. In practice, however, many are unaware of its existence, and only those who consciously support ethno-cultural practices actively participate. The authors conclude that ethnicity institutions (such as public organizations) play a key role in the construction and maintenance of ethnic identity, influencing the self-identification of individuals and the production of ethnic attributes. The article em-phasizes the need to study ethnicity in conjunction with institutionalized practices that shape its visible manifes-tations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.019
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.148
GPT teacher head0.412
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueОбщество социология психология педагогикаSame topicArctic and Russian Policy StudiesFrench-language works237,207