Réflexions sur les dynamiques coloniales : perspectives au sein de la francophonie du Grand Vancouver
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette note de recherche présente les perspectives de membres d’une communauté francophone en situation minoritaire (CFSM) concernant les dynamiques coloniales, c’est-à-dire les dynamiques de pouvoir qui trouvent leurs origines dans le colonialisme européen. Nous examinons les perceptions de ces dynamiques qui opèrent au sein de la communauté, envers les peuples autochtones d’une part et les personnes immigrantes racisées d’autre part. Nous nous appuyons sur 37 entrevues avec des membres de la CFSM du Grand Vancouver et des informateur.rice.s clés. Les résultats traitent : 1) des relations entre la CFSM et les peuples autochtones; 2) de l’autoreprésentation de la CFSM et de son rôle dans la colonisation; 3) de la promotion du français dans un contexte colonial; 4) des enjeux d’immigration et de cohésion communautaire en lien avec les dynamiques coloniales au sein de la CFSM. Enfin, nous élaborons des recommandations vers la réconciliation ou la décolonisation pour les CFSM.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.039 | 0.018 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".