MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412756801 · doi:10.26434/chemrxiv-2025-4pk4w

Semantically-Linked Ontological Knowledge Extraction Graph For Domain-Specific Knowledge Discovery In Scientific Literature

2025· preprint· en· W4412756801 on OpenAlexafffund
Sana Kashgouli, Ali Malek, S. Shayan Mousavi Masouleh, Shahlla Naseri, Kogie Esteban, Robert E. Black, Michael S. Freund, Mita Dasog, Khalid Fatih

Bibliographic record

VenueChemRxiv · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSemantic Web and Ontologies
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaDalhousie University
FundersNational Research Council CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaKillam TrustsDalhousie University
KeywordsKnowledge graphKnowledge extractionComputer scienceDomain knowledgeInformation retrievalGraphScientific discoveryData scienceDomain (mathematical analysis)Natural language processingKnowledge managementArtificial intelligenceTheoretical computer sciencePsychologyMathematicsCognitive science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The rapid growth of scientific papers presents several challenges for researchers, including information overload, data fragmentation, lack of standard terminology, and limited interoperability. These issues make it increasingly difficult to keep up with the literature and extract useful, field-specific information efficiently. To address these challenges, we introduce the semantically-linked ontological knowledge extraction framework, a tool that combines smart linking of concepts, flexible ontology building, and graph-based reasoning to organize and extract knowledge. This semantically-linked ontological knowledge extraction graph (SOKE Graph) leverages large-language models to extract domain-specific concepts from scientific articles, ensuring both semantic accuracy and adaptability to new data. These concepts are organized using an ontology—a structured framework of terms and relationships—that supports systematic data collection by grouping information into clearly defined layers. The resulting knowledge graph enables structured representation of extracted domain-specific information, allowing researchers to explore relationships between concepts and efficiently retrieve relevant data aligned with the objectives of this work. This approach allows SOKE Graph to find the connections between concepts and publications, and retrieve the most relevant studies in response to user questions. Initial evaluations of SOKE Graph show that it helps improve the accuracy of filtering high-relevance papers from large datasets compared to using only large-language models, and generates structured, interpretable outputs that facilitate data-driven insights. Moreover, this framework provides a robust and scalable artificial intelligence-based tool that accelerates literature analysis, guides decision-making, and helps researchers efficiently locate relevant information within complex scientific domains.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0170.014
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.005
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemRxivSame topicSemantic Web and OntologiesFrench-language works237,207