MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412758259 · doi:10.1021/acsenergylett.5c01503

Reduced Flow Battery Capacity Fade from Mixed Redox-Active Organics Beyond the Rule of Mixtures

2025· article· en· W4412758259 on OpenAlexafffund
Kyumin Lee, Kiana Amini, Michael J. Aziz

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Energy Letters · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced battery technologies research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaOffice of Science
KeywordsFadeRedoxFlow batteryBattery (electricity)Flow (mathematics)Environmental scienceCapacity lossChemical engineeringMaterials scienceChemistryComputer scienceElectrodeInorganic chemistryElectrochemistryEngineeringThermodynamicsMechanicsPhysicsPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aqueous organic redox flow batteries offer a sustainable approach to long-duration energy storage but suffer from molecular degradation. Here, we present a mixed redox-active strategy that stabilizes 2,6-dihydroxyanthraquinone (DHAQ) by enabling in situ regeneration of redox-active species under standard operating conditions. By incorporating 0.1 M of 4,4′-((9,10-anthraquinone-2,6-diyl)dioxy)dibutyrate (DBEAQ) into a 0.1 M DHAQ electrolyte, the fade rate is reduced from 4.7% to 0.9% per day, a 62% decrease relative to the 2.35%/day expected from a noninteracting mixture. Increasing DBEAQ concentration to 0.2 M further lowers fade to 0.43% per day, representing a 73% reduction relative to the expected value of 1.57%. Electrochemical and NMR data show that regeneration occurs via chemical oxidation of anthrone to a dimer, followed by electrochemical reoxidation to DHAQ. This approach is not limited to DBEAQ, suggesting broad applicability to other anthraquinones. The underlying regeneration mechanism offers a general framework for improving electrolyte stability in organic redox flow batteries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS Energy LettersSame topicAdvanced battery technologies researchFrench-language works237,207