Effects of the Mindful Somatic Psychoeducation Program on the Mental Health of Unmarried Mothers: A Randomized Control Trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the effects of the mindful somatic psychoeducation program (MSPP) on the mental health of unmarried mothers. METHODS: Sixteen unmarried mothers with children aged 0-5 years were randomly assigned to an intervention group (IG, n=8) or control group (CG, n=8). The IG participated in an 8-week MSPP, while the CG maintained their usual routines. Pre- and post-assessments included the Resilience Quotient (RQ), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and Physical Self-Description Questionnaire. Quantitative data were analyzed using Wilcoxon signed-rank and Mann-Whitney U tests. Qualitative interviews were analyzed using Giorgi's phenomenological method. RESULTS: The IG showed significant improvements in self-regulation, positivity, and overall resilience (p<0.05). Anxiety and depression levels significantly decreased (p<0.05), and self-esteem improved (p<0.05), while no significant changes were found in the CG. Qualitative findings revealed: 1) changes in the soma (e.g., improved posture, pain relief), 2) enhanced mind-body integration (e.g., emotional regulation through breath and movement), and 3) increased mindfulness and self-regulation (e.g., reduced self-blame, improved parenting responses). CONCLUSION: This study confirmed that MSPP helps unmarried mothers experience positive changes in physical, psychological, and social variables. These results serve as empirical foundational data for expanding the application areas of the MSPP and for research aimed at promoting the health of unmarried mothers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".