segcsvd <sub>PVS</sub> : A convolutional neural network-based tool for quantification of enlarged perivascular spaces (PVS) on T1-weighted images
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Introduction Enlarged perivascular spaces (PVS) are imaging markers of cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) that are associated with age, disease phenotypes, and overall health. Quantification of PVS is challenging but necessary to expand an understanding of their role in cerebrovascular pathology. Accurate and automated segmentation of PVS on T1-weighted images would be valuable given the widespread use of T1-weighted imaging protocols in multisite clinical and research datasets. Methods We introduce segcsvd PVS , a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based tool for automated PVS segmentation on T1-weighted images. segcsvd PVS was developed using a novel hierarchical approach that builds on existing tools and incorporates robust training strategies to enhance the accuracy and consistency of PVS segmentation. Performance was evaluated using a comprehensive evaluation strategy that included comparison to existing benchmark methods, ablation-based validation, accuracy validation against manual ground truth annotations, correlation with age-related PVS burden as a biological benchmark, and extensive robustness testing. Results segcsvd PVS achieved strong object-level performance for basal ganglia PVS (DSC = 0.78), exhibiting both high sensitivity (SNS = 0.80) and precision (PRC = 0.78). Although voxel-level precision was lower (PRC = 0.57), manual correction improved this by only ~3%, indicating that the additional voxels reflected primary boundary- or extent-related differences rather than correctable false positive error. For non-basal ganglia PVS, segcsvd PVS outperformed benchmark methods, exhibiting higher voxel-level performance across several metrics (DSC = 0.60, SNS = 0.67, PRC = 0.57, NSD = 0.77), despite overall lower performance relative to basal ganglia PVS. Additionally, the association between age and segmentation-derived measures of PVS burden were consistently stronger and more reliable for segcsvd PVS compared to benchmark methods across three cohorts (test6, ADNI, CAHHM), providing further evidence of the accuracy and consistency of its segmentation output. Conclusions segcsvd PVS demonstrates robust performance across diverse imaging conditions and improved sensitivity to biologically meaningful associations, supporting its utility as a T1-based PVS segmentation tool.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".