Bibliographic record
Abstract
Poher's theory of universons (gravitational quanta) makes it possible to reconcile general relativity and quantum physics. The universon, responsible for gravitation, could be the only elementary particle, making up electrons and quarks. Based on this new quantum gravitation theory and extrapolating beyond, we propose that: Each electron within the atom is a “cloud” of millions of universons, circulating in an erratic way around the nucleus as a result of constantly interacting with anisotropic flows of universons. The tunneling effect is due to anisotropic fluxes of universons of much higher-than-average energy, giving a particle the additional energy allowing it to cross the potential barrier. Radioactivity results from gravitation, more precisely from random fluctuations within anisotropic fluxes of universons and could be explained without relying on the weak and strong interactions. Considering that universons interact only with subatomic particles (and not directly at the macroscopic/ supra-atomic level), the gravitational interaction at the subatomic level could be much stronger than at the macroscopic level; it could be revised upwards by a huge factor: 1030 for nucleons and between 1032 and 1048 for quarks. Furthermore, within the nucleus, the repulsive force between protons could be weaker if we consider the charges of the d quark (-1⁄3) and u quark (+2⁄3) and not their overall charge +1. Thus, the gravitational interaction revised upwards at the subatomic level could explain the cohesion of nucleons within the atomic nucleus and the cohesion of quarks, without relying on the strong interaction, making gravitation a candidate as the only fundamental interaction. This heuristic approach still needs complementary studies and experimental validation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".