MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412773682 · doi:10.1177/18758967251353036

Multi-Objective Threshold Optimized Image De-Noising Algorithm for High Density Mixed Impulse Noise

2025· article· en· W4412773682 on OpenAlex
Suresh Babu, V. R. Vijaykumar, K. Mohaideen Abdul Kadhar, R. Sudhakar

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Signal Denoising Methods
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImpulse noiseComputer scienceNoise (video)AlgorithmImpulse (physics)Image (mathematics)Artificial intelligencePhysicsPixel

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a novel Multi-Objective Optimization based Fuzzy Switching Median Filter (MOOFASMF) to remove high density Random Valued Impulse Noise (RVIN), “Salt & Pepper” Impulse Noise (SPIN) and Mixed Impulse Noise (MIN). In this work, multi-objective optimization technique is used to find out the fuzzy switching median filter threshold values for accurate detection of corrupted pixels. The proposed multi-objective framework uses Decomposition based Multi Objective Evolutionary Algorithm (MOEA/D) to obtain optimized fuzzy switching median filter drives the threshold values with the objectives Mean Square Error (MSE) and inverse of Structural Similarity Index Metrics (SSIM) as optimization objectives. Even though the MSE and SSIM are not closely related parameters, the optimized threshold value gives better results in terms of both PSNR and SSIM. The advantages of the proposed framework are that it works effectively on RVIN, SPIN, and MIN-affected images. The effectiveness of the proposed framework is outstanding for high-density RVIN, SPIN, and MIN, which makes it more advantageous over other existing methods. Experimental results in terms of visual and quantitative metrics such as Peak Signal to Noise Ratio (PSNR), Mean Square Error (MSE), Structural Similarity Index Metrics (SSIM), and Edge Preservation Index (EPI) clearly demonstrates the better performance of the proposed algorithm over the state of art techniques. The proposed framework performed 6.02% and 32.11% better than the best existing methods in terms of PSNR and SSIM for the mixture of 40% SPIN & 50% RVIN affected image.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.701
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it