Bonheur en boule: an adapted group-based physical activity program for youth with disabilities
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction Youth with disabilities face significant barriers to physical activity (PA) participation, despite its documented benefits across cognitive, social, affective, and physical domains. Physical literacy (PL) and self-determination theory (SDT) offer complementary frameworks for designing adapted PA programs that foster autonomy, competence, and relatedness. However, limited research integrates both frameworks in adapted PA programs. This study evaluates the impact of Bonheur en boule (BEB), an adapted group-based PA program, on basic psychological needs, global self-esteem, and PA intentions of youth with disabilities while also assessing parental satisfaction. Methods A mixed-methods approach was used. Eleven youth ( M age = 13.27, SD = 5.42) with various disabilities participated in the BEB program, consisting of two 15-week sessions of adapted Dek Hockey (Ball hockey). Quantitative measures assessed participants' basic psychological needs (autonomy, competence, relatedness), global self-esteem, and PA intentions at three time points. Non-parametric tests (Friedman and Wilcoxon signed-rank) were used for statistical analyses. Parent satisfaction was evaluated through semi-structured interviews, analyzed using content analysis. Results Significant improvements were observed across all three basic psychological needs and global self-esteem. Competence and autonomy satisfaction increased notably between the first and second time points ( p < 0.01), while global self-esteem improved later in the program ( p < 0.01). All participants ( n = 11) expressed intentions to continue both PA and the program. Parental feedback highlighted positive changes in children's cognitive (e.g., attention, problem-solving), social (e.g., friendships, teamwork), affective (e.g., emotional regulation, confidence), and physical (e.g., motor skills, endurance) development. Parents also valued the program's inclusive approach and flexibility. Discussion Findings suggest that an SDT and PL based PA program can foster satisfaction of basic psychological needs leading to self-determination, increase global self-esteem and support PA engagement among youth with disabilities. The program's structure, emphasizing autonomy, competence, and social connections, contributed to participant development. Parents' strong appreciation underscores the program's perceived effectiveness. However, challenges such as small sample size and the lack of a control group limit generalizability. Conclusion BEB demonstrates the feasibility of an adapted PA program rooted in SDT and PL principles, showing promising outcomes for youth with disabilities. Future research should explore long-term behavioral impacts and broader implementation strategies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".