MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Baseline physiologic characteristics of participants in the APOLLO ( Personalized rehAbilitation PrOgram in aLLOgeneic Bone Marrow Transplantation) study assessed by MRI: preliminary results

2025· article· en· W4412805656 on OpenAlexaff
C Kruger, Mark J. Haykowsky, J.F. Grenier, D. Ian Paterson, Richard B. Thompson, Edith Pituskin

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal Supplements · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNutrition and Health in Aging
Canadian institutionsOttawa Heart InstituteUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBone marrow transplantationRehabilitationBone marrow transplantBaseline (sea)TransplantationPhysical therapyApolloBone marrowOncologySurgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract Over 50,000 hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCTs) are performed worldwide annually. Patients receiving HSCT for relapsed disease have commonly received prior chemotherapy protocols resulting in reduced physiologic capacity. We have previously shown that treatment-related alterations to muscle/fat distribution and muscle quality significantly reduces physical functioning (VO2peak). Sarcopenic obesity is an independent risk factor of prolonged hospitalization and inferior overall survival in HSCT. In APOLLO, we are utilizing novel MRI techniques studying lean and fat mass in relation to physical performance and quality of life. Aim to characterize muscle and fat distribution in baseline MRI scans of patients with hematologic diseases participating in the APOLLO study compared to sex-matched normal population. Methods In the initial 11 participants, quantitative fat and water separated images were used to measure intermuscular fat and muscle volumes from mid-thigh and abdomen were performed. The volumes of muscle, intermuscular, visceral, and subcutaneous fat was measured using custom semi-automated software to identify the boundaries of muscle and the distinct fat groups. Results Four females (age 59.5 ± 8) and 7 males (age 67.1 ± 7.5) were included. All were pretreated with a range of 1 – 4 lines of chemotherapy. Compared to our sex-matched healthy control cohort, both females and males had relatively less total thigh muscle volume (5% and 23%) and greater thigh intramuscular fat fraction (17% and 37%). Mean subcutaneous thigh fat in females was 21% lower vs 29% higher in men compared to controls. Abdominal MRI demonstrated 23% less abdominal muscle in women with no difference in males from norms. Abdominal intermuscular fat was 19% greater in women and 52% greater in men. Visceral fat was 21% greater than normal in females and 91% greater in men. Discussion In these preliminary results, prior to undergoing HSCT we observed abnormal patterns and potentially deleterious changes to muscle and fat pools in thigh and abdominal regions. High-intensity drug doses alongside severe deconditioning with prolonged bedfast states would only exacerbate poor body composition and frailty. The high morbidity and mortality rates of HSCT may well be associated with low muscle/ high fat volume distributions, not evaluable without advanced imaging. This work has implications for pre-habilitation in people with high-risk hematologic malignancies, targeted post-HSCT rehabilitation, nutritional studies and other interventions specifically aimed at improving body composition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.431

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.401
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Heart Journal SupplementsSame topicNutrition and Health in AgingFrench-language works237,207