Depletion of endomembrane reservoirs drives phagocytic appetite exhaustion in macrophages
Bibliographic record
Abstract
During phagocytosis, a phagocytic cup grows via F-actin remodeling and localized secretion to entrap a particle within a phagosome, which then fuses with endosomes and lysosomes to digest the particle, followed by phagosome resolution. As spatially limited systems, phagocytes have a maximal phagocytic capacity, at which point further uptake must be reduced. However, the processes responsible for phagocytic appetite exhaustion as phagocytes reach their maximal phagocytic capacity are poorly defined. We found that macrophages at their capacity have lower surface levels of Fcγ receptors but overexpression of these receptors did not increase their capacity, suggesting that receptor levels are not limiting. We found that surface membrane in-folding, membrane tension and cortical F-actin were all reduced in exhausted macrophages. Although this might contribute to appetite suppression, we also found that 'free' endosomes and lysosomes were severely depleted in exhausted macrophages. Consequently, focal exocytosis at sites of externally bound particles was reduced. In comparison, macrophages recovered their appetite if phagosome resolution was permitted. We propose that depletion of the endomembrane pools is a major determinant of phagocytic fatigue as macrophages reach their phagocytic capacity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".