MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412810194 · doi:10.31436/jop.v5i2.386

Stingless Bee Honey Stick Deodorant: Formulation, Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activities

2025· article· en· W4412810194 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Pharmacy · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBee Products Chemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsRoyal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada
FundersInternational Islamic University Malaysia
KeywordsDeodorantAntimicrobialStingless beeHoney beeAntioxidantTraditional medicineBiologyFood scienceMicrobiologyBotanyMedicineChemistryApidaeBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Deodorant often contain ingredients like aluminium salts, triclosan, fragrances, propylene glycol, and parabens that are usually associated with skin irritation and other health conditions. This study addresses the problem by formulating and characterising a natural deodorant that was free from these ingredients by using stingless bee honey (SBH) as an antibacterial and antioxidant ingredient. SBH, recognised for its efficacy in inhibiting the proliferation of odour-producing bacteria like Staphylococcus sp, was integrated into a stick deodorant formulation owing to its significant benefits. Methods: The evaluation of SBH began with testing its antioxidant activity, including total phenolic content (TPC), total flavonoid content (TFC) and DPPH assay. Thereafter, the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) were determined. Based on the MIC value, an SBH-stick deodorant was formulated and then characterised based on its pH, softening point, antimicrobial study by using well diffusion method and stability study (30 °C ± 2 °C /75% RH ± 5%) for two weeks. Results: The TPC and TFC in this study were 57.99 ± 0.38 mg GAE/100g and 0.132 ± 0.04 mg QE/mL, respectively. Meanwhile, the DPPH scavenging activity was 66.78 ± 0.45%. The result showed that 20% w/w and 50% w/w of SBH were needed as MIC and MBC, respectively. The formulated stick deodorant was reported to have suitable pH, softening point and exhibit its antibacterial activity towards Staphyloccoccus aureus after being formulated as deodorant. It was also stable during the two weeks of storage. Conclusion: The SBH stick deodorant was successfully formulated and demonstrated potential antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus, a known body-odour causing bacteria. These findings highlight the potential application of SBH as a natural antibacterial agent in personal care products, offering a promising alternative to synthetic deodorants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.156

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it