Comparative Clinical Outcomes of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Coronary Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study was to examine how post- surgical complications affect quality of life of patients who have undergone either Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) surgery as well as Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) surgery. A quantitative research design was used and 300 cardiac patients had been sampled, 150 patients per group (CABG and PCI). Purposive sampling method was also used where relevant participants were involved. The analyses of the data were carried out by Pearson correlation, ANOVA, and chi-square procedures with the help of SPSS software. The correlation analysis revealed significant moderate negative association between post-operative complication and quality of life in the complete sample (r = -0.463, p < 0.01). This implies that, the more the complications, the poorer the quality of life of patients. The CABG group had a stronger negative correlation when tackled independently (r = -0.492) than the PCI group (r = -0.421), meaning that the CABG patients were yet more affected by complications on their quality of life. ANOVA indicated the limitation of a significant difference between the two groups in recovery time (F = 9.76, p < 0.01), with PCI patients taking shorter time to recover. Chi-square test also demonstrated a significant relationship between the nature of the surgery and the presence of the complications (2 = 11.420, p = 0.001). These results pinpoint that the kind of surgical intervention one is subjected to does not just affect the length of time taken to recuperate but also affect post-surgery results and the general well-being of the patient. The findings can assist medical professionals in managing patients to better care and reducing the instances of complications particularly among the patients with high risk cases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".