MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4412810504 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554945

Star formation at different stages of ram-pressure stripping as observed through far-ultraviolet imaging of 13 GASP galaxies

2025· article· en· W4412810504 on OpenAlexaff
Koshy George, Bianca M. Poggianti, Benedetta Vulcani, Marco Gullieuszik, J. Postma, J. Fritz, Patrick Côté, Yara L. Jaffé, A. Moretti, A. Ignesti, Giorgia Peluso, Neven Tomičić, Annapurni Subramaniam, S. K. Ghosh, S. N. Tandon

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsHerzberg Institute of AstrophysicsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsUltravioletStripping (fiber)Ram pressureStar formationGalaxyAstronomyOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Galaxies undergoing ram-pressure stripping develop gaseous tails that can extend several kiloparsecs outside the galaxy disc. Under favourable conditions, star formation can occur in the stripped tail, but there are cases where it does not happen, and this can be attributed to several factors, including the properties of the intracluster medium and different stages of stripping, although a clear consensus has not yet been reached. We used FUV and Hα imaging from the GASP survey to investigate how different stages of stripping affect star formation properties in the tail and disc of 13 galaxies undergoing stripping. FUV imaging provides a direct opportunity to study star formation, unlike Hα, which is an indirect tracer and can have other mechanisms responsible for the emission. The 13 galaxies have different stripping strengths, as identified from the MUSE integral field spectroscopy. The star-forming knots in the disc and tails show a good correspondence between the measured FUV and Hα flux. This is especially true for strong and extreme cases of stripping, which have developed extended ionised gaseous tails featuring clumpy structures. The mechanism behind the Hα emission on the tails of these regions, which correlates well with FUV emission, is photoionisation caused by young massive stars. Optical emission line ratio maps enable us to understand the emission mechanism, which can be attributed to star formation, LINER activity, or a combination of both phenomena and AGN. The star-forming regions in the emission line maps correspond well to the areas with significant FUV flux in these galaxies. FUV imaging reveals that six galaxies exhibit minimal star formation in their tails. In two cases, star formation is limited to the central regions, and their discs are truncated. In galaxies with truncated discs, star formation is confined to a smaller region on the disc, as indicated by the FUV flux, compared to Hα. Galaxies with strong stripping, marked by significant FUV and Hα emission along their tails, are undergoing recent star formation and are likely recent infalls. In contrast, galaxies with truncated discs confine star formation to the centre, likely because they have completed a cluster crossing that depleted most of their outer gaseous disc. Galaxies with little FUV flux along their tails show unresolved Hα emission, particularly in the extended Hα tail where no FUV emission is present. The unresolved Hα emission along the tail may be the result of processes other than star formation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and Astrophysics→Same topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena→French-language works237,207→