Outcomes After Unilateral Adrenalectomy in Asymmetrical Bilateral Primary Aldosteronism
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Lateralization by adrenal vein sampling (AVS) is the gold standard for diagnosis of unilateral primary aldosteronism. Aldosterone production from the contralateral gland suggests bilateral disease; however, little is known regarding outcomes from patients with grossly elevated (but asymmetrical) contralateral aldosterone production after unilateral adrenalectomy. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed of cases from the Calgary AVS database with (1) successful AVS (selectivity index ≥3 bilaterally after cosyntropin stimulation); (2) lateralization by AVS (lateralization index ≥3), stimulated or unstimulated; (3) absence of contralateral suppression (contralateral suppression index ≥2 on the nondominant side) stimulated or unstimulated; and (4) underwent unilateral adrenalectomy guided by AVS lateralization. Postsurgical outcomes were classified per PASO criteria. RESULTS: A total of 29 cases met inclusion criteria and underwent unilateral adrenalectomy with postsurgical outcomes available. Of patients with biochemical follow-up data, 20 of 27 had a complete biochemical response and 3 of 27 a partial response (median follow-up time of 10.3 weeks, interquartile range, 4.0-18.3). Four of 29 patients had a complete clinical response, while 18 of 29 patients had a partial clinical response (median follow-up time of 27.3 weeks, interquartile range, 10.7-35.6), such that 75% of patients had either complete or partial clinical response to unilateral adrenalectomy. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with bilateral (elevated contralateral suppression index) but asymmetrical primary aldosteronism, unilateral adrenalectomy can achieve positive biochemical and clinical outcomes in the short to mid-term. Elevated contralateral suppression index should not necessarily preclude recommendation of unilateral adrenalectomy in patients with lateralized primary aldosteronism, though longer-term studies are needed to clarify the rates of disease recurrence and benefits of a debulking procedure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".