MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412821047 · doi:10.1007/s11031-025-10151-z

Basic psychological needs satisfaction: an international examination of invariance across 22 languages and 32 countries

2025· article· en· W4412821047 on OpenAlexafffund
Joshua B. Grubbs, István Tóth‐Király, Léna Nagy, Mónika Koós, Shane W. Kraus, Zsolt Demetrovics, Marc N. Potenza, Rafael Ballester‐Arnal, Dominik Batthyány, Sophie Bergeron, Joël Billieux, Peer Briken, Julius Burkauskas, Georgina Cárdenas‐López, Joana Carvalho, Jesús Castro‐Calvo, Lijun Chen, Carol Strong, Giacomo Ciocca, Ornella Corazza, Rita I. Csákó, David P. Fernandez, Hironobu Fujiwara, Elaine F. Fernandez, Johannes Fuß, Roman Gabrhelík, Ateret Gewirtz‐Meydan, Biljana Gjoneska, Mateusz Gola, Hashim Talib Hashim, Md. Saiful Islam, Mustafa Ismail, Martha C. Jiménez‐Martínez, Tanja Jurin, Ondrej Kalina, Verena Klein, András Költő, Sang‐Kyu Lee, Karol Lewczuk, Chung‐Ying Lin, Christine Löchner, Silvia López‐Alvarado, Kateřina Lukavská, Percy Mayta‐Tristán, D.J. Miller, Oľga Orosová, Gábor Orosz, Fernando P. Ponce, Gonzalo R. Quintana, Gabriel C. Quintero Garzola, Jano Ramos‐Diaz, Kévin Rigaud, Ann Rousseau, Marion K. Schulmeyer, Pratap Sharan, Mami Shibata, Sheikh Shoib, Vera Sigre‐Leirós, Luke Sniewski, Ognen Spasovski, Vesta Steiblienė, Dan J. Stein, Julian Strizek, Aleksandar Štulhofer, Marie‐Pier Vaillancourt‐Morel, Marie Claire Van Hout, Marco de Tubino Scanavino, Erick Ryuji G. Yamaguchi, Beáta Bőthe

Bibliographic record

VenueMotivation and Emotion · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMotivation and Self-Concept in Sports
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityUniversité de MontréalUniversité du Québec à Trois-RivièresStatistics Canada
FundersNational Research, Development and Innovation OfficeSistema Nacional de Investigación, Secretaría Nacional de Ciencia, Tecnología e InnovaciónCanada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of CanadaNational Social Science Fund of ChinaJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceWorldwide Universities NetworkNemzeti Kutatási, Fejlesztési és Innovaciós AlapFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéRégion Hauts-de-FranceAuckland University of Technology, New ZealandNational Research Foundation of KoreaInternational Center for Responsible GamingUniversidad Científica del SurNarodowe Centrum Nauki
KeywordsPsychologyMeasurement invarianceSocial psychologyStructural equation modelingConfirmatory factor analysisMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueMotivation and EmotionSame topicMotivation and Self-Concept in SportsFrench-language works237,207