MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4412822142 · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-09398-w

Intraarticular injection of the stromal vascular fraction for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial

2025· article· en· W4412822142 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Junyue Lu, Tianshan Wen, Haoyuan Huang, Chen Xie, Jiliang Kang, Jiahao Huang, Jiaxuan Hu, Tin‐Yu Wu, Youliang Wen

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOsteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersGannan Medical UniversityEducation Department of Jiangxi Province
KeywordsOsteoarthritisRandomized controlled trialMedicineClinical trialSurgeryInternal medicinePathologyAlternative medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Currently, conservative treatment for knee osteoarthritis (KOA) has limited efficacy, and autologous adipose-derived stromal vascular fraction (SVF) knee injections, a novel treatment approach, are receiving widespread attention. Our study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of SVF treatment for KOA patients. This randomized controlled trial sought to assess the efficacy and safety of intra-articular SVF injections for the treatment of KOA, both as an independent intervention and in conjunction with conventional rehabilitation. Sixty-six KOA subjects were randomly divided into three groups: (1) the SVF group received a single SVF intra-articular knee injection; (2) the control group received conventional rehabilitation treatment (muscle strength training, interferential therapy, and manual therapy, 5 times a week for a total of 4 weeks); and (3) the combination therapy group received a single SVF intra-articular knee injection followed by conventional rehabilitation treatment. Outcomes were assessed during a 12-month follow-up period, with outcome measures including the visual analog scale for pain; the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index for pain, stiffness, and function; range of motion (ROM); and the occurrence of complications. A total of 62 patients completed the follow-up. There were no significant baseline differences among the groups. The results after treatment revealed that the SVF group and the combination therapy group significantly outperformed the control group in terms of pain relief, improvement in knee function, and increased mobility (P < 0.05). Throughout the treatment and follow-up periods, no severe adverse events were reported in any of the three groups (P > 0.05). The results of this study indicate that SVF intra-articular injection alone or in combination with conventional rehabilitation methods can significantly improve pain, knee function, and stiffness in KOA patients, with the therapeutic effects continuing to increase over a 12-month period. SVF treatment provides an effective and safe therapeutic option for KOA patients and has important implications for future clinical practice and research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific Reports→Same topicOsteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms→French-language works237,207→