MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412822679 · doi:10.1016/j.jor.2025.07.009

Use of serotonergic antidepressants and perioperative complications in patients undergoing lower limb arthroplasty: Systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies

2025· article· en· W4412822679 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Dimitrios Grammatikopoulos, Eustathios Kenanidis, Georgios Foukarakis, Christothea-Alexandra Tsiridis, Michael Potoupnis, Eleftherios Tsiridis

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Orthopaedics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTotal Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSerotonergicPerioperativeMeta-analysisArthroplastyMEDLINESystematic reviewSurgerySerotoninInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SRIs) are commonly utilised antidepressants among populations in Western countries; however, their use has been linked to adverse effects and postoperative complications. This systematic review assessed the risk of both early and late perioperative complications in SRIs users undergoing elective total hip arthroplasty (THA) and knee arthroplasty (TKA) compared to non-users. This study adhered to the 2020 PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Science Direct/Scopus, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews was conducted from inception until January 2025. Comparative studies examining SRI users and non-users undergoing elective THA or TKA that addressed at least one postoperative outcome (blood loss, postoperative haemoglobin reduction, transfusion rate, length of stay, readmission and revision rate) were included. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was employed to evaluate the quality of the included studies. A meta-analysis was performed to assess the risk of transfusion, utilising a random-effects model. Ten comparative cohort studies, including two prospective and eight retrospective studies, were included in this analysis, involving 2,098,833 patients who underwent either elective THA or TKA. Among these patients, 418,527 were using SRIs during the perioperative period, with a mean age of 65.2 years. Our meta-analysis revealed an odds ratio of 1.78 (95 % CI, 1.11, 2.83; p = 0.02) concerning the blood transfusion rate in patients utilising SRIs, although it was characterised by considerable heterogeneity (I 2 = 97 %). The findings regarding length of stay, readmission rate, and revision rate were inconclusive. The use of SRIs in patients undergoing elective THA and TKA may be linked to a slightly increased risk of bleeding and need for blood transfusion. However, considering the potential benefits of these medications for this patient group, it remains uncertain whether discontinuing them during the perioperative period is advisable. More high-quality studies are required to establish an etiological relationship.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.234
Threshold uncertainty score0.485

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.095
GPT teacher head0.363
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of OrthopaedicsSame topicTotal Knee Arthroplasty OutcomesFrench-language works237,207