MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412829046 · doi:10.1159/000547332

Continuous Chest Compressions with Asynchronous Ventilation in Asphyxiated Preterm Lambs with Asystole

2025· article· en· W4412829046 on OpenAlexaff
Evan Giusto, Deepika Sankaran, Amy Lesneski, Michele Persiani, Rebecca Valdez, Victoria L. Hammitt, Satyan Lakshminrusimha, Payam Vali

Bibliographic record

VenueNeonatology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Canadian institutionsReach Technologies (Canada)
FundersEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
KeywordsAsystoleMedicineAnesthesiaVentilation (architecture)Cardiopulmonary resuscitationMechanical ventilationResuscitation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Gas exchange and perfusion are impaired during neonatal cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Continuous chest compressions with asynchronous ventilation (CCCaV) improve oxygenation and hemodynamics in term animal models compared to synchronized 3:1 compressions-to-ventilation (C:V). We hypothesized that CCCaV improves gas exchange and hemodynamics in preterm lambs. Methods: Sixteen extremely preterm (124–126 days gestation) lambs were asphyxiated to cardiac arrest by umbilical cord occlusion. Lambs were randomized to 3:1 C:V following the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation algorithm or CCCaV (120 compressions and 40 asynchronized ventilations per minute). Epinephrine was given 3 min into resuscitation and repeated every 3 min until return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Results: All lambs achieved ROSC with no difference in time to ROSC. There was no difference in cerebral oxygen delivery (C-DO<sub>2</sub>) in lambs resuscitated with CCCaV versus 3:1 C:V (0.05 [0.041] vs. 0.03 [0.031] mL O<sub>2</sub>/kg/min, respectively) during chest compressions. CCCaV yielded higher arterial oxygen content (CaO<sub>2</sub> 2.07 [1.00] vs. 1.07 [0.69] mL O<sub>2</sub>/dL), mean arterial pressure (14.2 [2.6] vs. 13.2 [2.3] mm Hg), and diastolic pressure (8.1 [1.8] vs. 7.1 [1.4] mm Hg) during chest compressions compared to 3:1 C:V. There was no difference in plasma reduced to oxidized glutathione [GSH/GSSG ratio] between groups at 10 min post-ROSC. Discussion: CCCaV in asystolic preterm lambs did not alter C-DO<sub>2</sub>, frequency, or time to ROSC compared to standard 3:1 C:V resuscitation but increased CaO<sub>2</sub>, mean, and diastolic arterial pressure compared to 3:1 C:V without increasing plasma oxidative stress markers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.334

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeonatologySame topicCardiac Arrest and ResuscitationFrench-language works237,207